My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC23651
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC23651
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:23:30 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:51:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
9/19/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colowyo C-1981-019 <br />27 September 2007 <br />Pg 3/7 <br />Hydrologic Balance (cont.): -The East Taylor Pond (NPDES Ol OA) contained a small <br />amount of water (to the bottom of the riser pipe at the bottom of the pond) at the <br />time of the inspection. The pond embankment was well vegetated and appeared <br />to be stable at the time of the inspection. No erosional problems noted on the <br />embankment at the time of the inspection. The emergency spillway is an open, <br />trapezoidal riprapped channel. The spillway was stable and well maintained at the <br />time of the inspection. <br />-The Prospect Pond (NPDES 007A) contained water approximately six inches below <br />the top of the discharge pipe but was not discharging at the time of the inspection. <br />Due to the large amount of water and debris that entered the pond, the weep-hole <br />on the riser pipe plugged up. This has changed the permanent pool elevation of the <br />pond since it is unable to discharge, thereby changing the pond's ability to <br />effectively treat a storm event. Tony indicated that Colowyo would be pumping the <br />pond down that week and cleaning out the weep-hole and riser, if necessary. There <br />was a large amount of new sediment that entered the pond during and after the <br />storm as well. Finally, there was enough runoff going into the pond that water and <br />sediment made it up to the level of the emergency spillway and just entered the <br />spillway. No water, however, discharged through the emergency spillway, as <br />evidenced by the high water mark around the inside of the pond and the <br />emergency spillway. The pond embankment was well vegetated and appeared to <br />be stable at the time of the inspection. No erosional problems noted on the <br />embankment at the time of the inspection. The emergency spillway is an open, <br />trapezoidal riprapped channel. The spillway was stable and well maintained at the <br />time of the inspection. Prior to the recent storms, Colowyo had estimated that there <br />is approximately 4,000 yards of material in the pond that will be cleaned out this year. <br />This amount has increased, as mentioned above. Colowyo was looking at using <br />some of the sediment as "borrow" for the construction of the Section 28 Pond <br />embankment but, due to the material now being saturated (the pond had been dry <br />most of the summer), this may not be possible. If this option is pursued, lab test will <br />need to be performed to verify its suitability for use in the embankment. <br />-The Gulch A Pond (NPDES 004A) contained water approximately two feet below the <br />discharge pipe and was not discharging at the time of the inspection. The pond <br />embankment was well vegetated and appeared to be stable at the time of the <br />inspection. No erosional problems noted on the embankment at the time of the <br />inspection. The emergency spillway is an open, trapezoidal riprapped channel. The <br />spillway was stable and well maintained at the time of the inspection. Goodspring <br />Creek was flowing (very muddy) at the time of the inspection. <br />-The Section 16 Pond (NPDES 009) was not inspected. <br />-The Streeter Pond (NPDES 001 A) contained water approximately one foot below the <br />discharge pipe and was discharging through the weep hole at the time of the <br />inspection. The discharge appeared to be clear. The pond embankment was well <br />vegetated and appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. No erosional <br />problems noted on the embankment at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.