INSPEC22634 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'. . • 3 overflows and other spills. (This was never accomplished.) Upland diversion ditch around tailings impoundment plugged (PB, correction deadline 3/24!92). 3 lvlar. '92 MLRD (M. Long) ltr to GHVLP & COM, lnc. subj.: Reason to Believe to the Co- opcators for failure to repair liner. 4 Mar. '92 MLRD (M. Long) Itr to GHVLP & COM, Inc. subj.: Reason to Believe to the Co- operators for failure to provide a technical revision for water management. 4 Mar. '92 MLRD (M. Long) hr to GHVLP 8c COM, Inc. subj.: Reason to Believe to the Co- operators for uncontained tailings material around mill building. 2"; Mar. '92 MLRB issues C&DO and assesses civil fine of 523,370 for processing ore from the ~ Buono and Cmss mines, not owned by GHVLP. 3 Apr. '92 DMG sends Notice of Possible Violation (NOPV} letters to Co-Operators for uncoatained tailings spills, failure to provide a TR with detailed watt pumping plan, and rips in impoundment liner. 16 Apr. '92 DMG inspection report notes (under "Problems/Possible Violations and Corrective Actions') failure to repair rips and holes in tailings pond liner (PV, correction deadline 5/22/92), ancoatained tailings material and erosion channels ootside mill building and tailings impoundment u well as off site between the tailings impoundment and the Hsul A edit (PV, carnction deadline 5/22/92), only one of three standpipes are erected in the tailings pond (PB, correction deadline 5/22192), upland diversion ditches nut properly maintained and functional (PB, correction deadline 5/22!92, hazardous location of tailings discharge line (PB, correction deadline 5/22192), failure to minimize possible offsite damage from fuel teaks (PB, correction deadline 5/22/92), failure to fence the tailings impoundment (PB, correction deadline 5/22!92), failure to remove /age debris pile from permit area (PB, correction deadline 5/22/92), failure to display proper signs and markers (PB, correction deadline 5/22/92, correction to include boundary markers, a sign at the site .~ entrance which includes site name, operator Dame, and a statement that an MLRD permit ` has peen obtained, permit number). :t7 Apr. '92 Date of last known well samples analyzed by Huffman laboratories. All samples showed precipitates on bottom, so analyses of Liquid portions only is of dubious value. (see note for 3U April 1993) :Z8 Apr. '92 BCLUD ltr to CUM, Inc, stating that the milling of imported ore is an industrial use not allowed in a Forestry Zone (i.e. at the Gdd Hill Milt). Note: this letter not in COME files, see rtifererue in BCLUD (M. Sprague) Itr to COM, Inc. (G. Fraser) dated 22 Aug. '94. 28 May '92 Board issues NOV's on 3 April issues (failure to contain tailings, failure to conform to the use of the permitted water managemmt rystem or submit a technical revision that ~~. -- - rid rid is