My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC21198
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC21198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:21:43 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:38:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold
Inspection Date
4/16/2003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: ~~-loan-sae <br />INSPECTION DATE: ~-1~-n'~ INSPECTORS INITIALS: ~- <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a monitoring inspection of the site on 4-16-03. The main purpose of the inspection was to <br />collect quarterly wafer samples for cyanide analyses from the under drain discharge area and to also verity <br />that the operator had indeed placed a berm or some sort of barrier to prevent rocks from damaging the liner on <br />Phase IV, PREGNANT SOLUTION COLLECTION AREA. As promised, CC&V had placed concrete barriers above the <br />lined area to protect the liner from falling rock damage. In addition, CC&V, hand delivered as requested during <br />the inspection on 4-10-03, the written remedial actions they plan to implement for the area. The letter is <br />attached with this inspection report. The Division is satisfied with both the concrete barriers and the written <br />explanation. Once the area is covered with three feet of leak collection gravel, there will be no need for the <br />concrete barriers. <br />Inspected the under drain discharge area and with Lawrence Meyers present, and collected an eight ounce <br />sample, EACH, from the South Under drain and AG -1 for WAD cyanide analysis. The North under drain was dry. <br />Operator was offered a split but decided to collect their own samples. Field readings for Temperature, PH, DO, <br />flow rate and conductivity were collected for each sample. Samples were properly iced and delivered to <br />CDOH&E lab in the after noon, the same day. <br />Continued the inspection to the Phase I AND II HIGH AND LOW VOLUME SOLUTION COLLECTION AREAS AND <br />RECORDED THE FOLLOWING READINGS FROM THE HIGH AND LOW VOLUME TRANSDUCERS. <br />Phase I high volume solution collection transducer # i was recorded at 30.3 # 2 was at 33.6 and # 3 was at 33.0 <br />low volume solution collection transducer # 1 was recorded at .44 and #2 was at ,10. <br />Piezomefer for the area was recorded of 37.2 feet (depth). <br />Phase II high volume solution collection transducer # 4 was recorded at 24.5, # 5 was at 18.3 and # 6 was at <br />24.6. Low volume solution collection transducer # 1 was at .40 and # 2 was at .26. <br />Piezomefer for the preg pond was at 28.6 feet. (ALL TRANSDUCER READINGS ARE IN FEET OF HYDROSTATIC HEAD) <br />Inspected the external pond, it was holding what appeared to be frozen water. While in the area, collected the <br />following readings from the low volume solution collection transducers. <br />Transducer # 1 was recorded at 17.6 inches and # 2 was at 14.9 inches of hydrostatic head. Pond was holding <br />some water , no major problem noted. <br />I & E Contact Address <br />NAME: MR. PHIL BARNES <br />OPERATOR: CC&V <br />STREET: P n Box 141 <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP: vicr~a c~ ana~n <br />Harry Posey (e-mail) <br />cc: ^ CE <br />^ BL <br />^ FS <br />^ HW <br />^ HMWMD (CH) <br />^ SE <br />^ WQCD (CH) <br />^ OTHER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.