Laserfiche WebLink
.' <br /> <br />MINE SITE INSPECTION EVALUATION REPOE2T PAGE 6 <br />Bourg Strip Mine <br />GENERAL COMMENTS <br />A complete oversight inspection was conducted of the Bourg Strip with <br />the partial participation of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Divi- <br />sion (MLRD). The inspection included the mine and load-out sites. <br />The authorizations to operate were available for review at the mine of- <br />fice on site. The review included State Permit Number 79-125 dated <br />8/27/80; pond certifications for ponds A, B, C and H dated 9/16/82; a <br />road construction certification dated 9j16/81; the technical revision to <br />the permanent program permit application (#C-021-81) dated 9/22/81 to <br />include the 2.82 acre load-out site; the permanent program permit appli- <br />cation itself, and water monitoring analyses for surface and ground <br />water dated 7/29/82 and 10/1/82, respectively. NPDES permit number <br />CO-0036854 dated 4/28/81 authorizes ciischarge to Mann Draw and event- <br />ually the receiving Canadian River. The limit of unconsolidated stream- <br />laid deposits is north of the mine area with no evidence of historical <br />irrigation or subirrigation of Mann Draw. <br />The partial construction of a permanent fill designated the east dump <br />has been a subject of concern on the Bourg Strip. Walden Coal Company <br />has contended that excess spoil conditions exist and merit construction <br />of the fill. Excess spoil conditions were not recognized in the origin- <br />al permit, according to Mike Savage of the MLRD. At issue is the fact <br />that construction of the fill was begun prior to the pending approval of <br />the permanent program permit application in which the excess spoil and <br />fill are addressed. A study completed by Dames and Moore of Golden, <br />Colorado, dated 5/17/82, concluded that "...hydrologic impacts may con- <br />sist of a small reduction in runoff, a minor increase in ground water <br />recharge, and a negligible impact on surface or ground water flow volume <br />or quality outside property limits. Geotechnical impacts will be negli- <br />gible. Fill procedures will produce fill densities and strengths such <br />that stability will be satisfactory. Post mining topography will be <br />similar to premining topography." According to the permit application, <br />the east dump will encompass approximately 40 acres upon completion. <br />The fill depth will range upward to 45 feet, though only 7.3 acres will <br />exceed 30 feet in depth. <br />A small ephemeral drainage course was situated in the present east dump <br />site. Mr. Savage stated that the MLRD believes that the fill will not <br />change the basic character of the topography or overall drainage, though <br />the ephemeral drainage will be rerouted. Since the anticipated environ- <br />mental impact is slight, the concern is for the legal precedent which <br />may result from approving a technical violation of the submission and <br />approval process which must precede actual construction. <br /> <br />