Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Page 2) <br /> <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-80-052 <br />INSPECTION DATE 12-28-93 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS RELATED TO THE COMPLAINT <br />This inspection was conducted ae the result of a complaint referral from the Colorado <br />Department of Health (CDH Log # 931201). The referral stated that a citizen had filmed <br />activities at the pit using a video cassette camera. The citizen reported that the tape <br />ehowe A&S Construction employees burying lime at the site and dumping petroleum product on <br />the ground. The Division has obtained a copy of the tape. The permittee may view and/or <br />copy the tape at Division offices. <br />At the time of this inspection, moat of the pit and processing areas were covered by several <br />inches of snow, and it was noted that the ground ie frozen solid. It was determined that A&S <br />Construction had set up a crusher array and an asphalt batch plant at the south-central <br />portion of the permit area. .Two small water pits had been excavated to support the batch <br />plant. The video tape shows that lime spread over the surface of the processing area was <br />back-filled into the water pit a. It is not evident from the tape how much lime was placed <br />in the pits - it appears,that the lime may have been present on the surface simply from <br />spilling incidental to the operations. Small amounts of lime were observed on the surface <br />in the processing area during the inspection; the back-filled water pits were covered by snow <br />and could not be inspected. Small amounts of lime spilled at a gravel pit and subsequently <br />covered during re-grading will not create an environmental problem - lime ie not a hazardous <br />substance unless it ie grossly mie-handled, e.g., large amounts of lime placed below or near <br />the water table could elevate ground water pH, or lime that is not covered with sufficient <br />soil could limit re-vegetation.efforta by raising soil pH. Based on information contained <br />on the video tape, the Division will require that the permittee determine the quantity of <br />lime present in the proceaeing area, and if it more than a trivial amount, remove it from the <br />site and dispose of it properly at a landfill. The investigation into the amount of lime <br />left on the site should be conducted using a backhoe or loader once the ground has thawed - <br />the permittee must notify the Division at least two weeks in advance of excavation so that <br />a Division inspector can be at the Bite. If it becomes evident that lime was mishandled at <br />the site, the permittee could be subject to a violation; if the lime at the site ie a small <br />quantity present incidental to normal operation, the matter can be dropped. <br />The video tape ehowe several 66-gallon drums stored in the proceaeing area. There is no <br />evidence of dumping of liquid on the tape; there is no evidence that the drums were <br />mishandled on the tape. There were no drums at the site at the time of the inspection. It <br />could not be determined if oil, fuel, solvent, etc. had been spilled due to snow cover. The <br />possible dumping of petroleum product that was reported to the Division will be investigated <br />when the ground has thawed, at the same time as the inspection referenced in the previous <br />paragraph. If it is evident that any industrial fluids have been mishandled, the permittee <br />will be required to remove and dispose of any contaminated soil, and may be subject to a <br />violation. The Division's jurisdiction over the matter of the lime and the 55-gallon drums <br />can be found in Section 34-32-116(7)(d) C.R.S. (Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act) which <br />states: <br />All refuse shall be disposed in a manner that will control unsightliness, <br />or deleterious effects from such refuse. <br />The permittee should refrain from earth-moving activities in the area of the affected lands <br />in question until the Division has made its inspection once the ground has thawed. <br />ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS <br />The bulk of the disturbance at the site, including all of the area of gravel extraction, ie <br />within phase 1, or the western half of the permit area. Some of the processing and <br />stockpiling activities may have encroached into phase 2. The operator has mined to the south <br />boundary of phase 1, and has partially back-filled the south perimeter high wall with over <br />