My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC15746
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC15746
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:17:06 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:12:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/12/1981
Doc Name
INSPECTION REPORT
From
MLR
To
SUNLAND MINING CORP
Inspection Date
2/25/1981
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'r <br />• <br />II, Compliance with Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act <br />CRS 1973, as amended 34-33-IO1, et. se ., <br />and the <br />Rules and Regulations Issued Pursuant to the Act <br />This includes a listing of the particular provisions of the regulatory program which were <br />examined during the course of this inspection, and identifies enforcement actions taken <br />during the inspection for failure to comply with the Rules and Regulations, the Act and <br />the permit. <br />4.02 All signs and markers were in compliance with CMLR regulations. <br />4.03 The only existing road on the site is a county road which is exempted from <br />CMLR regulations. - <br />4.04 Support facilities are in compliance by virtue of the sediment containment <br />facilities which contain the disturbed area. Damage to fish and wildlife <br />and diminution or degradation of water quality and quantity are minimized <br />by the facility design. <br />4.05 The hydrologic balance with respect to the disburbed area at the mine is <br />essentially maintained through compliance with a well-designed and maintained <br />sedimentation pond and diversion system. <br />Some material has sloughed into the ditches however, these ditches should be <br />kept clear of material. Ditches should also be kept clear of equipment <br />(i.e., corrugated pipe, etc.) which may decrease their capacity. Culverts <br />should be periodically cleared of vegetation (i.e., tumbleweed) and other <br />obstructions. <br />4.06 Because the face up and disturbed area were impacted by mining prior to <br />current regulations, no topsoil has been stockpiled. No further disturbance <br />is expected therefore no future stockpiling is planned. <br />4.07 Underground openings (portals) are not sealed because they still provide <br />access to the coal. <br />4.08 No blasting is occurring at the mine. <br />4.09 What little development waste is generated is being disposed of in the mine <br />workings. <br />4.12 There was a concern whether the face up excavation should be seeded to <br />improve stability. Dave Canning said he would be willing to try it but <br />he didn't think it would do much good. Some small slides and sloughs were <br />evident. This issue can be resolved during the permit review process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.