INSPEC15362 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Riverside Reservoir and Land Company Riverside Irrigation Distpict Farmers State Bank of Bru$h Case No. 90-CW-189 Page 19 Division Engineer. This schedule will set forth maximum monthly pumping amounts for each well, depletion associated with the gravel pits, previous monthly recharge, and will indicate the resulting pattern of stream depletion. Under no circumstances can the Bank and/or Riverside propose a depletion schedule which results in a net negative stream depletion impact. 42. Honthly reports: Riverside and the Bank shall submit monthly reF,orts to the Water Commissioner, Water District No. 1, showing actual pumping and stream depletion. Summaries of such reports shall be submit- ted annually to the Division Engineer. Based on the actual operation of the wells, Riverside and the Bank may propose a new pumping schedule for each well as long as a net positive stream depletion impact is indicated. Pumping by Riverside and the Bank will always be limited by the amount of water previously re- charged. An example of a monthly reporting form that may be used to administer this Decree is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Any monthly reporting form that is used in the administration of this decree must be acceptable to the Division Engineer, and may be amended from time to time with the approval of the iivision Engineer without obtaining the separate approval of this Court. 43. Integrated system: The surface water right, augmented structures, Recharge Ponds, and the other structures involved in this recharge project are parts of an integrated system. Accordingly, work on any one project feature will be considered in finding that reasonable diligence has been shown in the development of the other water rights for all features of the project. 44. Retained jurisdiction: In order to assure that the vested water rights of others are not injured by implementation of this plan for augmen- tation, the Court retains jurisdiction for a period of 10 years after the date of this Decree. Upon proper petition filed with the Court within that period, the Court will reconsider its approval of the plan for augmentation. In the event Applicants or any person, including the State Engineer, petitions the Court for reconsideration on any of the elements of the plan, the Court shall order appropriate notice to be given to all the parties hereto. Such petition shall be verified, made in good faith, and shall set forth with particularity the factual basis upon which