Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Riverside Reservoir and Land Company <br />Riverside Irrigation District <br />Farmers State Bank of Brush <br />Case No. 90-CW-189 <br />Page 16 <br />To quantify irrigation return flows, an irrigation effi- <br />ciency or sprinkler irrigation of 80$ will be assumed; for flood <br />irrigation, an irrigation efficiency of 60$ will be assumed. Net <br />groundwater withdrawals will be calculated as the amount pumped <br />less the assumed irrigation return flows. <br />35. Description of gravel pits to be augmented by Bank: <br />The Bank also intends to use a portion of its share (50$) of <br />the recharge credits generated by the Headley Recharge and <br />Augmentation Project to offset the depletive effects caused by or <br />associated with the gravel pits described in the following Table: <br />Name Location Maximum Surface Area <br />Gravel Pit No. 1 <br />W/2NE/4 and E/2NW/4 <br />29 5N 55W <br />17.16 acres <br />Gravel Pit No. 2 <br />Gravel Pit No. 4a <br />TOTAL <br />SW/4NE/4 29 5N 55W <br />E/2NW/4 W/2NE/4 <br />29 SN 55W <br />36. Evaporation from gravel pits: <br />13.77 acres <br />10.24 acres <br />41.17 acres <br />Evaporation from the gravel pits will be computed in the <br />same manner as for evaporation from the recharge ponds, and <br />according to the same evaporation rates described in paragraph <br />31.D. above. At times, the water levels visible in the gravel <br />pits are directly attributable to the recharge activities on the <br />Bank property. However, any time that water is visible in the <br />gravel pit(s), appropriate deductions for evaporative losses will <br />be made, regardless of the source of the water. Accordingly, <br />there will be no additional deduction from the recharge credits <br />to account for evaporative losses in the gravel pits. <br /> <br />