My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC15250
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC15250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:16:41 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/6/1980
Doc Name
REGION V ON SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
3/6/1980
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is <br />o • <br />~ ~/ • <br />Page 2 <br />Letter to Mr. Donald A. Crane <br />• Re: Minor Modification <br />February 6, 1980 <br />that this minor modification seeks approval only for topsoil <br />removal ,at the pond site in order 'to avoid construction <br />difficulties and related compliance problems which attend the <br />onset of the spring runoff season. <br />In addition EFC needs approval for topsoil and tree <br />removing activities on 70 acres included in the legal descrip- <br />tion set forth above in order to effect compliance with cer- <br />tain critical aspects of its reclamation plan with regard to <br />restoration and enhancement of sensitive wild life habitat <br />within the e::fisting federal mine plan area. <br />Upon receipt of federal lease C-081330 EFC was ini- <br />tially required to leave a 200 yard wildlife buffer zone on <br />the ridge top overlooking the Middle Creek Canyon. This area <br />was previously documented as being important to elk as a <br />wintering area and as a migration corridor. Subsequently, hoor- <br />ever, the USGS required that the buffer zone area be mined. <br />'In January of 1979, representatives of the U. S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service and the Colorado Division of 6ildlife <br />• consulted with EFC to determine how the existing wildlife <br />values of this buffer zone area could be maintained in light <br />of the decision of the USGS. The decision arrived at by <br />Harold Tyus, the Colorado Coal Coordinator f.or U.S.F.W.S., <br />and A11an Whittaker of the CDO4] was that EFC would reestab- <br />lish vegetative and topographic cover on the area via topo- <br />graphy created as a result of rough grading and by using <br />the large reclamatio~t loader to transplant numerous aspen <br />trees and other native trees and shrubs along the exposed <br />area. <br />EFC has complied with this agreement with federal <br />and state wildlife agencies on all of the lower portions of <br />the ridge top in Sections 17 and 18. Unfortunately, all of <br />the trees upslope from the drag lines have been either already <br />transplanted or eliminated as a result of topsoil removal. <br />The only practical way to plant trees in this sensitive wild- <br />life area and to maintain compliance orith the dictates of the <br />wildlife regulatory agencies would be to remove trees shrubs <br />and related topsoil located immediately adjacent to this <br />area to the west. By removing the trees and shrubs located <br />adjacent to the regraded surfaces doornhill from the mining <br />operations Energy Fuels Corporation would be able to co~ztinue, <br />without interruptio~l, its highly successful program of wild- <br />life habitat enhancement. <br />r~ <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.