My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC13095
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC13095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:14:44 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
12/13/2006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Elk Creek C-1981-022 <br />Pg 1/3 13 December 2006 ~7s-~ <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection of the Elk Creek and Sanborn Creek Mines conducted by <br />Jim Stark of CDRMS. The inspection was conducted on 13 December 2006. Jim Kiger of <br />Oxbow Mining, LLC accompanied me on the inspection. The mine was not producing coal at <br />the time of the inspection and the coal stockpile was low. The weather was cold and <br />overcast and the ground was covered with snow and muddy in spots. A train had just been <br />loaded and was sitting on the tracks at the loadout. <br />Availability of Records: All of the necessary records were available at the mine office. <br />Please see the DRMS Availability of Records form at the end of this inspection for more <br />detailed information. <br />Signs and Markers: All of the necessary signs were in place as required. All of the off-site <br />locations that were visited had the appropriate mine ID and disturbance boundary markers as <br />required. <br />Roads: -The mine access road is a paved road. The road is well maintained and in good <br />condition. <br />- The east yard haul road was wet and muddy but appeared to be stable and well maintained <br />at the time of the inspection. There were no rutting or erosional problems noted on the road. <br />- The road to the Elk Creek portals and facilities area was wet and muddy but appeared to be <br />stable and well maintained at the time of the inspection. No erosional problems were noted <br />on the road. <br />- The haul road to the West Valley Fill was partially covered with snow at the time of the <br />inspection. There was some water flowing on the road but no erosional problems were <br />noted. <br />- The haul road to the II-West Valley Fill was inaccessible due to snow at the time of the <br />inspection. <br />-The back entrance to the mine from Highway 133 was wet and muddy but appeared to be <br />stable at the time of the inspection. This road is primarily used to access the Sanborn Creek <br />gob vent boreholes and the mine when a train is blocking the main entrance. <br />Hydrologic Balance: - Pond A contained water approximately one foot below the top and <br />was not discharging at the time of the inspection. The pond is an incised pond. The pond <br />was stable at the time of the inspection. <br />- Pond B contained water approximately five feet below the emergency spillway at the time of <br />the inspection but was not discharging (discharge is through a gated valve below the water <br />level). The embankment was covered with snow but appeared to be stable. No erosional <br />problems were noted on the pond embankment. The emergency spillway was stable at the <br />time of the inspection. <br />- Pond D was full and was discharging at a rate of approximately 30 GPM at the time of the <br />inspection. The water discharge appeared to be clear. Jim Kiger indicated that he had not <br />yet sampled the discharge for the NPDES requirements but that he would that week. Water <br />was also flowing into the pond due to snow melt at the time of the inspection. The <br />embankment was covered with snow but appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.