Laserfiche WebLink
z <br />' III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />each consisting of a section of chalked slat placed inside a length <br />of capped, perforated PVC pipe, staked in place at a calibrated <br />channel cross section. The crest stage gages are monitored <br />monthly, and flows are measured at the time of monitoring with a <br />portable flume, if measureable flows exist. The crest stage gages <br />located on BLM surface within the wilderness study area are painted <br />a tan color to blend with the surroundings, as stipulated by BLM. <br />At the time of the inspection, Coal Creek was dry, and there was no <br />measureable flow at either of the monitoring sites on Jerry Creek, <br />although there was some water puddled in the channel at both the <br />upper and lower monitoring sites, and there was some flow in a <br />portion of the drainage between the monitoring sites. The operator <br />recorded peak flow elevations, and re-chalked the slats at each of <br />the four crest stage gages. <br />Rapid Creek and Cottonwood Creek surface water stations have been <br />in place for a number of years. These stations are flumes of <br />various dimensions, each connected to a stilling basin equipped <br />with a continuous recorder. The operator checks these sites every <br />few weeks to insure that they are functioning properly, and to <br />manually record water levels indicated on the flume, for <br />calibration purposes. During the inspection, the operator recorded <br />flow elevation in the flume, replaced the chart paper and re-set <br />the recorder at each station. The permit specifies continuous flow <br />data for SWGS-O1, but only bimonthly data from June-November for <br />the other gaging stations. The flumes apparently work well except <br />during peak flow periods when they are occasionally overtopped, <br />clogged by debris, or dislodged. The need for peak flow data with <br />respect to SWGS-O1 will be reviewed in conjunction with the current <br />AHR review and PR-02, and the monitoring schedule or design will be <br />amended as appropriate. At SWGS-02, the connection between the <br />flume and the stilling basin appeared to be somewhat out of level, <br />and repair appears to be necessary to insure that the continuous <br />recorder would function properly at low flow levels. Permit <br />requirements are still being met here by the manual bimonthly <br />measurements taken June-November. <br />Alluvial ground water wells GWMS-O1 (A and B), and 03 (A and B), on <br />Rapid Creek, and GWMS-02 (A and B), on Cottonwood Creek were also <br />inspected. Water levels are monitored in these wells in May and <br />September. Measurements were not taken during the inspection. <br />The operator indicated that preliminary plans to drill several <br />wells for monitoring effects of mining on the Rollins Sandstone <br />were being considered, in response to midterm review concerns. <br />