My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC10729
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC10729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:12:26 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:47:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979166
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/16/1997
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
6/18/1997
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 21 <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID 1l M-79-166 <br />INSPECTION DATE 6-18-97 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS SSS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a routine monitoring inspection of the Bennett Gravel Pit, located approximately 1.5 miles <br />northwest of Delta, Colorado. The operation is permitted for disturbance of 9.75 acres for excavation of <br />sand and gravel from a wet pit in the flood plain of the Gunnison River. The permit indicates that washing, <br />crushing, and screening are not part of the mining plan and are therfore not permitted to occur on site <br />without revising the permit. The site is to be reclaimed to a pond with an island or peninsula for wildlife <br />habitat. <br />The operation has current crushing and screening operations occurring at a location that appears to be <br />outside the permit boundary. Review of the approved permit indicates that mining may have occurred <br />beyond the approved western and northern permit boundaries as well. The operator has indicated that the <br />mining that occurred on the west end of the pit was done by Elam Construction. The operator produced a <br />contract for that excavation wherein which Elam Construction had agreed that they would be responsible <br />for obtaining a 111 permit for mining that area, adjacent to the west boundary of the Bennett Gravel Pit. <br />Review of the Division records indicates that Elam Construction did not apply for any mine reclamation permit <br />for this location. The operator will need to document, by land survey or other method, where the disturbed <br />areas of the Bennett Gravel Pit are in relation to the approved permit boundary. <br />The operator has indicated that all disturbance related to mining is within his property boundary and not <br />within 200 feet of any other property or structure. He also indicated that crushing operations were <br />apparently already located outside the approved permit boundary when the succession of operator inspection <br />was done in 1994, The area to the north of the permit boundary, where the crusher and stockpiles are <br />currently located was apparently stripped of several feet of soil previously, whem the old tannery nearby was <br />being cleaned up. The tannery evidently had some significant hazardous waste problems that needed <br />excavating. The material from this site was used to regrade the site. This excavation and regrading was <br />not part of the mining operation according to the operator. The site was left in a barren state and <br />revegetated itself with a majority of greasewood. <br />The Gunnison River has been slowly cutting away at the land between it and the gravel pit. The operator <br />indicated that the river finally cut through to the pond during runoff this past spring. The operator indicated <br />that he had contacted the Army Corps of Engineers with a proposal to rip rap the bank to protect his <br />property. lie indicated that the Corps was willing to permit the operation, but that the U, S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service said no to the idea due to endangered fish protection programs. The Division will be in contact with <br />these two agencies to try and work out a plan for protection of the endangered species, the river, the gravel <br />mining operation and the landowners property. The operator is encouraged to send copies of any past <br />correspondence documenting this process to the Durango Field Office of the Division of Minerals and <br />Geology. <br />The mine identification sign is in place and in compliance. Permit boundary markers are few and far <br />between. The operator will need to install additional permit boundary markers to positively and permanently <br />mark the permit boundary for the life of mine. This process is recommended to be done per surveyed <br />landmarks so it is accurate. <br />All mine sites in Colorado are required to be bonded for the actual cost of reclamation if, in the case of permit <br />revocation and bond forfeiture, the state were to put the reclamation work out for competitive bid. Review <br />and recalculation of the required bond for reclamation of this operation will take place over the next few <br />months. A detailed estimate of the recalculated cost, based on current reclamation costs, the approved <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.