My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC10317
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC10317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:11:55 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:45:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983090
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
5/14/1999
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-83-090 <br />INSPECTION DATE 05/14/99 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ESC <br />The following problems (PB) and/or potssible violations (PV) (and suggested corrective <br />actions) were identified during this inspection. The problems should be corrected by the <br />dates given, or they will become possible violations. The possible violations should be <br />corrected by the dates given. to reduce the.~r severity when considered by the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Hoard. The inspector noted on the previous page should be notified of all <br />corrective actions taken. <br />PROBLEMS/POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS <br />AND <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS <br />1. The reclamation plan do•=_s not adequately address protection of 60 Davs of <br />the pipeline facility f:com slides or damage as a result of the Receipt <br />mining and reclamation operation. Under the Construction PB or PV:PB <br />Material Rules and Regu:Lations, areas outside of the affected TOPIC(S):SC <br />land shall be protected from slides or damage occurring during <br />the mining and reclama t:ion operation (C.R.S. 34-32.5-116 (4)(i)). <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION: <br />The operator will need t:o file a revision to the permit to <br />adequately address stability of the pipeline corridor. The <br />revision will need to bee filed within 60 days of receipt of this <br />report, or included witYi corrective action #2 noted below. <br />2. A slurry wall was constructed around Pit #5 and #6 and does not 60 Davs of <br />conform to the postminir.~.g land use. Receipt <br />PB or PV:PB <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION: TOPIC (S):MP&AR <br />The operator will need to file an amendment to Permit M-83-090 to <br />change the final approve~9 land use, and include a map locating the <br />slurry wall and a certified construction report detailing the as- <br />built" conditions. In addition, the operator will need to provide <br />sign-off from the Office: of the State Engineer (OSE) or provide <br />sufficient amount of reclamation bond. If the OSE signs off on the <br />slurry wall, the need for drawings, as-built certifications or bond <br />will not be required. The amendment will need to be filed within <br />60 days of receipt of this inspection report. <br />3. Leafy Spurge was noted o:n site, and is considered a noxious weed 60 Davs of <br />in Weld County. Rule 3.1.10(6) requires methods of weed control Receipt <br />be employed for all noxious weed species. PB or PV:PB <br />TOPIC (S):RV <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION: <br />(Page 4) <br />Submit a weed control plan to control the spread of Leafy Spurge <br />in the form of a revision to the permit. The plan may be <br />submitted with either item #1 or #2 noted above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.