My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC06321
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC06321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:02:26 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:26:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/13/1992
Doc Name
OSM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
2/28/1992
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INSPECTION REPORT 4 <br />emergency spillway until the primary spillway was open. <br />Johnson Draw pond #7 was not discharging through the open channel. <br />A spring between Ponds #7 and 8 was flowing about 4 to 5 gallons a <br />minute. Pond #9 was discharging water through the spillway. <br />One of their 32 yard draglines was working at the top end of Ashmore on <br />the east side of the pit. <br />The sediment ponds in East, West and Middle Pyeatt Draw were checked for <br />stability and discharge. All were snow covered with little if any <br />standing water. There was no discharge from any of the ponds. <br />There was some question about topsoil removal and storage on the Middle <br />"A" haulroad near the "A" pit substation. Operations people widened the <br />haul road in that area on the 10th of January to better accomodate pit <br />traffic, in doing so, they windrowed topsoil back from the new <br />disturbance into an area behind the road berm. The comment was made <br />that the soil should have been picked up and moved~to a permitted <br />permanent storage area. Reg and permit review did not require placement <br />in permanent storage. Changes in the 30 CFR standards now allow the <br />operator to place the soil in an area with no requirement or time limit <br />for moving it to permanent storage on surface mines but there are <br />however, there are still some requirements for doing so in underground <br />regs. State regulations have been combined to include both surface and <br />underground standards but this being a surface mine the interpretation <br />was made that the requirement to place in permanent storage is at the <br />discretion of the operator. <br />In addition to the question about storage and timing therof, there was <br />some discussion as to whether the operator is required to mulch the <br />topsoil when it is redistributed and planted with permanent vegetation. <br />Review of the mine plan and State Regulations indicated that the opertor <br />is not required to mulch but instead has opetions as to how it is <br />treated to reduce the potential of erosion. We did not find comments in <br />the mine plan as to how that is to be done on this mine and must assume <br />that State approval requires no more. <br />RECORDS REVIEW <br />Their mining permit, C-81-010, expires, December 31, 1992. <br />Their NPDES permit ,CO-0032115, for discharge points 001-014 expires, <br />July 31, 1996. <br />Their certificate of public liability insurance isued by the Federal <br />Insurance Co. is effective until July 20, 1992. The description of <br />operations on the certificate lists Trapper Mining Permit C-81-010 as <br />being one of the operations having coverge. It was noted that the <br />certificate did not list blasting oeprations as being covered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.