My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC05129
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC05129
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:59:51 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:20:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997089
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
12/4/1997
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT STONE GRAVEL PIT
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Wallace Erickson <br />December 4, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />blade had been dropped and quite a few new roads had been made in a random <br />fashion. Also, one of these roads ran across the top of the cultural site and its <br />midden. Can I assume that you did not walk a large portion of the permit azea <br />since there is no mention of the larger trenches and the roads that have been <br />cut? <br />Since more trenches and numerous roads were cut, [believe that the <br />exploration area affected is more than your estimated 500 square feet. Since <br />the Act does not specifically state that there is a 1,600 square foot exclusion, I <br />believe that Mr. Stone should have submitted an "Exploration Notice° required <br />by the Act to engage in the exploration for construction materials. Also, was a <br />"Notice of Completion° of the exploration filed with the Board? <br />Since I am not familiar with "An Act" or "Construction Material Rules and <br />Regulations" it is possible that I have misinterpreted these regulations. If I <br />have not misinterpreted them, I believe that the above questions are serious <br />and need to be responded to as soon as possible. Also, if a trench was dug on <br />site 5MT2020, this is a violation of Section 106 of the National Historic <br />Preservation Act. <br />Thank you for your time and effort. <br />Sincerely, <br />Susie Campbell Bell <br />cc: Ms. Laverne Lemay <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.