My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - M1983052 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1983052
>
_INSPECTION - M1983052 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 11:50:57 AM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:16:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983052
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
NOTICE OF INSPECTION & INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
2/8/1985
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INSPECTION REPORT - PAGE 2 <br /> FILE NO. 83-52 <br /> DATE: February 8, 1985 <br /> OBSERVATIONS OF IMPORTANCE: <br /> 1 . The purpose of this inspection was to follow-up on recent problems which <br /> the CMLRB has found reason to believe are in violation and to review in <br /> the field the amendment recently submitted by Marathon Gold Corporation <br /> (MGC) to the Division. <br /> 2. Prior to the field inspection, a brief meeting was held to discuss the <br /> process for the upcoming hearing for Notice of Violation and Civil <br /> Penalties. The following were in attendance: <br /> Steve Bennett (BLM) <br /> Dave Berry (CMLRD) <br /> Bill Caniglia (Attorney, MGC) <br /> Camille Farrell (CMLRD) <br /> Garry Miller (MGC) <br /> Philip Saletta (CMLRD) <br /> The inspector explained the process and answered questions concerning <br /> the hearing. The operator requested that the hearing be held on <br /> Thursday, February 28, 1985. <br /> 3. Upon arrival at the field site, a meeting was held with Mark Anderson <br /> and John Mensik. The following items were discussed: <br /> 1 ) The photographs taken by John Arambel were shown to the operator. <br /> The operator did not comment on the photographs explaining that <br /> MGC is presently in law suit with Mr. Arambel , and at present they <br /> were unsure of the legal status. <br /> 2) The operator stated that MGC presently controls mineral rights to <br /> substantial acreage in the area. <br /> 4. The cyanide facility was inspected. The operator has stored all <br /> detoxified sample material in drums. This storage was in response to a <br /> recommendation in the November 30, 1984 inspection. The operator stated <br /> that no material has been disposed of since the November Inspection. <br /> 5. The operator stated that water samples were taken from the tailings pond <br /> and drainage below the plant site. The inspector requested that sample <br /> results be submitted to the Division. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.