My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC03288
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC03288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:58:07 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:09:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979181
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
NOTICE OF INSPECTION AND INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
10/15/1985
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i <br />INSPECTION REPORT - PAGE 2 <br />FILE N0. 79-181/UG/HR <br />DATE: October 15, 1985 <br />OBSERVATIONS OF IMPORTANCE: <br />1. There were no mine personnel or mining activities at the site during this <br />inspection. <br />2. The site appears to exceed the two (2) acres which were permitted. <br />Operations, buildings, portal entries, ponds, waste rock dump and equipment <br />storage are all part of the mining operation. The inspectors estimate <br />disturbance and activities at approximately 4 to 5 acres. See Recommendation <br />No. 1 and No. 7. <br />3. Financial warranty on this site is $2,500.00 and needs to be increased. <br />See Recommendation No. 2. <br />4. The waste rock bench outslope is encroaching up the Snefels Creek <br />Channel. Further disposal of waste rock may possibly block creek flow. See <br />Recommendation No. 3. <br />5. Much trash and junk is on the site and needs to be properly disposed. The <br />permit does not have an adequate mine refuse disposal plan. See <br />Recommendation No. 4. <br />6. Drainage and runoff control on this site is poor. Diversion ditches could <br />be constructed to minimize runoff onto the disturbed area. This would improve <br />operating conditions during spring time by controlling sediment and minimizing <br />runoff onto the operating site. See Recommendation No. 5. <br />7. The lower mine portal (?) was discharging approximately 20-25 gpm. Flow <br />routing of this water is poor. However, mine discharge water does flow into a <br />small sediment pond. The crest and out slopes of this dam are eroding and in <br />need of minor grading. See Recommendation No. 6. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />1. A map of all mining related facilities should be submitted. Permit <br />boundaries should be located and total acreage determined. <br />2. Financial warranty needs to be reviewed. The Division believes a <br />$5,000.00 Financial Warranty needs to be submitted. <br />3. Further disposal of waste rock along the creeks should be discontinued. <br />Further expansion of the waste rock pile/bench needs to be located at a <br />suitable site within the permit boundary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.