My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC00395
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC00395
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:55:55 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 7:55:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
1/13/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Southfield C-81-014 <br />13 Jan 04 ~~ <br />Page 1 /2 <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a partial inspection of the Southfield mine conducted by Jim Stark of CDMG. <br />The mine is in permanent cessation and all of the initial reclamation (structural <br />demolition, backfilling and rough grading, topsoil replacement and the seeding of a <br />cover crop) has been completed. The mine has applied for and received a Phase I <br />Bond Release for structural demolition, backfilling and rough grading and drainage <br />control reestablishment. The weather was cool and clear and the ground was <br />covered with a couple inches of snow on north-facing slopes and in shady areas of <br />the mine. <br />Signs and Markers: All of the required signs (including the mine ID sign, permit <br />boundary markers, the ID sign at the refuse pile and topsoil markers) were in place. <br />The signs at the loadout were also in place. <br />Roads: -The mine access road was a bit muddy but it was well maintained and <br />appeared to be stable and in good condition. There was some very minor rutting but <br />it does not appear to be a problem at this time. <br />- The haul road to the refuse pile was also muddy. It was well maintained and <br />appeared to be stable and in good condition. <br />-The road around the east and north sides of the refuse pile to Pond 4 (and the <br />regraded pond 3 area) was well maintained and appeared to be stable and in <br />good condition. <br />-The road to the South Fan was covered with snow. The road was stable and in <br />good condition. There were no erosional problems noted on the road. <br />Hydrologic Balance: -Pond 4 did not contain any water at the time of the inspection. <br />The pond was well vegetated and appeared to be stable and in good condition. <br />There were no signs of erosional problems on the pond embankment at the time of <br />the inspection. Pond 4 is aself-dewatering pond. The dewatering pipe is equipped <br />with a trash rack and antivorfex device. <br />- Pond 5 was dry at the time of the inspection. The pond was well vegetated and <br />appeared to be stable and in good condition. There were no signs of erosional <br />problems on the pond embankment at the time of the inspection. Pond 5 is a self- <br />dewatering pond. The dewatering pipe is equipped with a trash rack and antivorfex <br />device. <br />- The 100-year ditch around the refuse pile appeared to be stable and in good <br />condition. No erosional problems were noted in the ditch at the time of the <br />inspection. <br />-The SAE at the South Fan (silt fence) was in place and appeared to be functioning <br />as designed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.