My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-06-23_REVISION - M1980244 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2025-06-23_REVISION - M1980244 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2025 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
6/24/2025 8:23:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/23/2025
Doc Name
Adequacy Review - Preliminary
From
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM14
Email Name
ERR
ZTT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID:45B9721 C-FDE2-4821-B686-80BBC79CA6DD <br /> structural fill or bedrock. During operations, a haul road will be constructed from the southwest to the <br /> northeast portion of the pad, allowing for ore to be loaded on the VLF." <br /> • 11. Section 7.2 discusses the Power Supply and backup generators on-site in case of a power <br /> outage. It is understood that preventive measures have been taken in response to the <br /> March 2024 storm event to shore up the backup power supply systems. It is also <br /> understood that a more thorough and comprehensive revision will be submitted following <br /> the conclusion of the on-going Rule 7.4.3 Independent Reviewer Evaluation of the storm <br /> event and VLFs.At this time, please update Section 7.2 to provide information regarding <br /> the existing and now additional preventive measures, including maintenance and testing <br /> schedules, additional structures or any other mitigation measures that have been or will <br /> be put into effect to ensure the reliability of the backup power systems for the site. <br /> Section 7.2 has been updated. <br /> 12. Within Section 7.2, Paragraph 2, it is stated that a 12-hour drain down period was used in <br /> the design of the PSSA. In accordance with the calculations presented in TR127, please <br /> discuss why a 24-hour drain down is not utilized. <br /> A 24-hour power outage scenario was used in the design for the PSSA. Section 7.2 has been revised. <br /> Exhibit E—Reclamation Plan (Rule 6.4.5): <br /> 13. Within Section 2.2, Paragraph 2, it is stated that 3.4 million cubic yards of growth medium <br /> are available from the existing and future development areas for the completion of <br /> reclamation which requires an approximate 3.3 million cubic yards.Within Exhibit D, it is <br /> noted that all areas except a small portion of Joe Dandy Hill within the AM14 expansion <br /> areas is already disturbed.Table D-4: Growth Medium Storage Areas shows there is <br /> currently 2.8 million cubic yards are currently stockpiled. Please discuss this half a million <br /> • cubic yard discrepancy and provide evidence and thorough documentation that there is <br /> sufficient growth medium to accomplish the reclamation at the site. <br /> The apparent discrepancy between the 2.8 million cubic yards (CY) currently stockpiled and the 3.4 <br /> million CY referenced as available for reclamation is due to the difference in how material volumes are <br /> measured and reported. Specifically, the 2.8 million CY reported in Table D-4 of Exhibit D reflects <br /> compacted cubic yards (CCY), representing the volume of growth medium after being placed and <br /> compacted into stockpiles using large-scale mining equipment. In contrast, the volume referenced in <br /> Section 2.2, Paragraph 2 (3.4 million CY) is reported in loose cubic yards (LCY), which is the volume <br /> expected after the material is re-handled and spread for reclamation. As standard practice in <br /> earthmoving and mining operations, compacted materials swell when excavated or spread, increasing <br /> in volume. CC&V applied a conservative swell factor of 20%, resulting in an estimated 3.4 million LCY <br /> of growth medium available from the 2.8 million CCY stockpiled. This exceeds the estimated 3.3 million <br /> LCY required for reclamation activities. Notably, the 20% swell factor used in this calculation is <br /> conservative when compared to typical swell factors published in the Caterpillar Performance <br /> Handbook for similar materials (included with Attachment 3 Revised Exhibit E). This conservative <br /> estimate ensures that there is a sufficient margin to meet reclamation volume requirements even under <br /> less favorable assumptions. Therefore, based on standard conversion methodologies and conservative <br /> assumptions, the currently stockpiled growth medium is sufficient to meet the reclamation needs at the <br /> site. <br /> 14. Section 2.7.1, Surface Mine Backfill Areas, does not include information regarding the <br /> South Cresson mine area backfill approved in TR142. Please update this section <br /> accordingly and ensure Exhibit C and F maps reflect this revision. <br /> TR142 was submitted but not yet approved when Amendment 14 was originally submitted. Section <br /> • 2.7.1 has been updated to include information regarding the South Cresson mine area backfill as <br /> approved in TR142. <br /> SSR Mining Inc. PAGE 4/19 <br /> II' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.