Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance <br />Partial Phase I, II and III Bond Release SL-23 Page 9 of 16 <br />applicable are contributing suspended solids to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area in excess of pre-mining <br />levels as determined by baseline data. <br /> <br />To evaluate for compliance with the applicable Rules, the Division reviewed SEDCAD sedimentology <br />demonstrations provided by Colowyo in Exhibit 07 Item 14 Appendix Exh7-14SP as approved in 2021 under TR- <br />145. Exhibit 07 Item 14 Appendix Exh7-14SP provides demonstrations for a 10-year 24-hour, 25-year 24-hour <br />and 100-year 24-hour storm events for the Streeter Ditch and Pond. All calculations demonstrated that under the <br />design specified, the Streeter Ditch and Pond effectively manage peak flow, runoff volume, and sediment loads <br />during all required storm test events. This determination was further corroborated by utilizing design criteria <br />specified in the SEDCAD demonstration for comparison with on the ground measured conditions. This <br />comparison revealed that measured design criteria, such as channel width, depth, and material (Table 1), was <br />consistent with the design criteria provided in the approved SEDCAD demonstration (Table 2). The Streeter Ditch <br />and Pond are constructed and functioning in line with design requirements and are effectivity managing peak <br />stormwater flows, runoff volumes, and sediment loads. This conclusion is supported by visual inspections of the <br />ditch and pond which showed overall stability in structure design, with no signs of flow outside the approved <br />channel, overtopping at the pond, or erosional features. <br /> <br />PHASE III <br /> <br />Post-mining Land Use <br /> <br />The post-mining land use at the Colowyo mine is rangeland and wildlife habitat. The Phase I, II and III Bond <br />Release areas requested with the SL-23 application were walked during the inspection. Streeter Pond has been <br />retained as a permanent structure in support of the post-mining land use, providing a water source for livestock and <br />wildlife. While Colowyo has not used the reclaimed lands for domestic livestock grazing, there is a large resident <br />elk herd that uses the reclaimed lands extensively. There are also several smaller herds of deer and pronghorn that <br />use the reclaimed East and West Pit. The wildlife use includes grazing (including winter grazing) and calving <br />areas. <br /> <br />Although not specifically addressed in Rule 3.03.1, the evaluation by the Division must also comply with the <br />considerations outlined in Rule 3.03.2(2). These include: “results of inspections and monitoring conducted <br />pursuant to 4.05.13 and 5.02, the degree of difficulty to complete any remaining reclamation, and whether <br />pollution of surface or subsurface water is occurring, the probability of future occurrence of such pollution, <br />and the estimated cost of abating such pollution”. Colowyo is not requesting release of groundwater or surface <br />water monitoring requirements through SL-23. Therefore, Colowyo remains in compliance with Rule 4.05.13. <br /> <br />The Division conducted a review of Colowyo’s Annual Hydrology Reports (AHR) from the past three water <br />years (2021, 2022, 2023). This review broke up discussion of surface and groundwater trends by drainage. The <br />SL-23 release area is contained within the Good Spring Creek watershed. The review found that while the <br />Good Spring Creek Point of Compliance (POC) well LGSW-1 was in compliance with NPL standards at the <br />end of 2023, there had been spikes in Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and Sulfate (SO4) concentrations <br />throughout the last few years. However, aside from well LGSW-1, concentrations in all other surface and <br />groundwater wells along Good Spring Creek show a consistent pattern of increase from upstream/upgradient <br />to downstream/downgradient and generally do not exceed NPL standards, outside of some noted anomalies. <br />Therefore, based on the Division’s AHR review and on-the-ground inspections, the Division has made the <br />determination that Streeter Ditch and Streeter Pond are not contributing to the pollution of surface or <br />subsurface water and have a low probability of enacting a future cause of such pollution. If the trend of <br />exceedances does not decrease as is predicted over time in Good Spring Creek or there is a marked impact on <br />water quality, a mitigation strategy may need to be developed. However, this is not the case at this time and <br />any future mitigation developments would not likely involve re-disturbing Streeter Pond or Ditch. Therefore, <br />Streeter Pond and Ditch are in compliance with the requirements of Rule 3.03.1 and 3.03.2.