Laserfiche WebLink
Eiviroineit, C. <br /> LARRY E.O'BRIAN 7985 VANCE DRIVE,SUITE 205A <br /> FOUNDER ARVADA,COLORADO 80003 <br /> STEVAN L.O'BRIAN 303-423-7297 <br /> PRESIDENT FAX 303-423-7599 <br /> September 9, 2024 <br /> Mr. Todd Jesse RECEIVED <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman St, Suite 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 SEP 16 2024 <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, <br /> Dear Todd; Mining and Safety <br /> Re: Big Bull Dog Trucking, Inc. - Soward Ranch Pit <br /> Permit # M-1988-021 - Adequacy Response #1 <br /> On behalf of our client Big Bull Dog Trucking, Inc. , I will <br /> respond to your August 30, 2024, preliminary adequacy review <br /> letter in the order and number format presented in that document . <br /> I have added each point to be addressed from your letter so when <br /> reviewing our response we do not have to keep referring back to <br /> your adequacy letter. <br /> As part of this response I have revised the appropriate <br /> places on the application form or Exhibits that are outlined in <br /> your letter. <br /> 1. Per Rule 6.2.1(2)(b) maps must be signed by the qualified person that created them. <br /> Please update Exhibit B-1 and B-2 to include a signature. <br /> I've never had to do that with the Exhibit B maps, but I' ll <br /> remember next time. Attached are updated versions of Map <br /> Exhibits B-1 & B-2 with the required signature. <br /> 2. The Application Form states that the site is located is Section 2, while Exhibit B-2 <br /> shows Section 18. Please clarify. <br /> That was a typographic error on my part. The correct Section <br /> is 18 . I have corrected the Location on Page 2 to match the <br /> legal description and maps and included a copy for the file. <br /> 3. The seed mix provided does not meet the diversity requirements of Rule 3.1.10. <br /> Please update the seed mix.Jn addition to grass species, it is recommended that the <br /> mix also include forbs and shrubs. <br /> The current seed mix was prepared by the local SCS office in <br /> 1988 and approved by the Division so it was acceptable at that <br /> time. As far as I know Rule 3 . 1 . 10 has not changed since <br /> then. The operator has had good luck this mix and success- <br />