Laserfiche WebLink
Colony Reclamation Cost Estimate, Update to Exhibit L Rev. Sept. 2023 <br /> were to be backfilled at an angle close to repose. Further, as stated on Page E-49 of the <br /> original permit application, "other appropriate measures" are anticipated here because <br /> this area "will consist of exposed bedrock and probably (is) not amenable to direct <br /> topsoiling." Similar to the rock slopes above and below the access roadways that were <br /> released in the 2007 Partial Acreage Release AR-01, no reclamation costs for the bare <br /> rock areas downstream of the cofferdam are therefore included in this estimate. <br /> In the final paragraph of the section dealing with "Dams" on Page E-48 of the original <br /> permit application, it states that "Upon abandonment the dams will be removed unless <br /> agreement is made with another party to utilize and assume responsibility for them. This <br /> approach was approved for Middle Fork Dam in the 2007 Partial Acreage Release AR- <br /> 01, and in view of the above discussion a similar approach for the Davis Gulch <br /> Cofferdam is the base case for this bond calculation. Accordingly, no reclamation costs <br /> are included for Area 9. <br /> Davis Dam Materials Stockpile, Area 10B <br /> This 10 acre area contains a stockpile of rock excavated from the Davis Gulch Dam site <br /> to store materials produced in clearing the dam foundation to be used later as rockfill for <br /> the dam's outer shell. It contains approximately 575,000 cy of miscellaneous rock <br /> materials, that in 1982 were intended to be used to construct the full size Davis Gulch <br /> Dam in 1982. It is unlikely that dam will be built as an earth and rockfill dam. If a dam is <br /> built in Davis Gulch, it will probably use the Roller Compacted Concrete technology that <br /> was used for Middle Fork Dam in 1984. Consequently, this stockpile will need to be <br /> removed and the exposed footprint regarded, topsoiled and seeded. <br /> The best location to relocate this material is the nearby Coarse Ore Gulch where it can <br /> be hauled and laid up against the valley walls at a relatively mild slopes until the <br /> materials stockpile is exhausted. The relocated stockpile materials placed in Coarse <br /> Ore Valley would then be topsoiled and revegetated. Once the rockfill stockpile has <br /> been exhausted, the underlying soils will be ripped in place and revegetated with the <br /> seed mix in Table E-6 on page E-42 of the 1980 permit application. The underlying soil <br /> materials will need to be ripped to a depth of 2 feet before re-seeding Some topsoil from <br /> the Upper Davis Gulch Topsoil Pile (Area 10D) may also be used here if the materials <br /> under the rock stockpile are not deemed suitable to sustain the revegetation. The <br /> footprint of the rock stockpile will then be revegetated with the seed mix in Table E-6 on <br /> Page E-42. <br /> The topsoil stockpile planned for this area would come from the nearby Upper Davis <br /> Gulch Topsoil Pile (Area 10D) until it is exhausted as needed to cover the 10 acres of <br /> this stockpile's footprint <br /> It should be noted that this pile does not impede flows in Upper Davis Gulch, and the <br /> channel around it was rip-rapped and slush grouted in the mid 1980s. The channel is <br /> stable. The presence of this stockpile does provide a good sediment trap from upstream <br /> flows and thereby reduces sediment load to the Davis Gulch Dam immediately <br /> downstream. The small reservoir impounded by the Davis Gulch Dam is currently used <br /> as a source of water for dust suppression on the plateau roads, and the sediment <br /> reduction due to this stockpile reduces the dredging needs for that pond. Finally, it <br /> serves as a convenient watering pond for livestock and wildlife in the area. At some <br /> future date it might be worth considering leaving this stockpile and its hardened channel <br /> Page 9 <br />