My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-02-02_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022013
>
2023-02-02_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 3:57:19 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 3:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/2/2023
Doc Name Note
Cover Letter
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Raptor Materials LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
prevent any negative impacts to the hydrologic balance of the two rivers. <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> We are not required to `Prevent,' but rather `Minimize' impacts. We believe the <br /> submittal conservation measures and provisions attain this standard. <br /> Rule 3.1.6 "Disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land <br /> and of the surrounding area and to the quantity or quality of water in surface and <br /> groundwater systems both during and after the mining operation and during <br /> reclamation shall be minimized by measures, " <br /> Considerable efforts are made to control storm flows, including the use of grassed <br /> waterways. Some rilling will occur on cut slopes, but the sediment is inbound. A <br /> minor 6-inch furrow above cut slopes will create a 1-foot swale that could <br /> minimize such rilling, especially valuable on reclaimed slopes above the final <br /> estimated water level of the basins. <br /> The stormwater management plan referenced in Exhibit I & J will address broader <br /> water management covering the material processing area and any piles of soil or <br /> inert fill constructed external to the excavations. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> The Division agrees that the word "minimize"is appropriate, rather than `prevent. " <br /> However, RMneeds to revise Exhibit G and re-submit it. Exhibit G should include <br /> the statements requested in the original adequacy,letter (using the word `minimize" <br /> as noted above). <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> Raptor has revised Exhibit G as requested (page 1, Footnotes 1 and 2). <br /> 44) Describe the physical dewatering system and provide a description of the <br /> operation of this system. <br /> A copy of the discharge permit application provided to CDH is included with this <br /> submittal. It will indicate information about the pump capacity and discharge rates. <br /> Exhibit D: Extraction Plan devoted a section to it, and AWES devoted a report to it, <br /> as provided with the other attachments in this reply. Here's what the permit <br /> application stated, followed by a blow-up of the feature visible near the #10 <br /> 451 Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation —Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.