My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-02-02_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022013
>
2023-02-02_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 3:57:19 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 3:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/2/2023
Doc Name Note
Cover Letter
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Raptor Materials LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
information is required for a detailed reclamation cost estimate and needs to be <br /> added to the Extraction Plan, Exhibit D. <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> The information requested has been included in revised Exhibit D (p 14, Footnote <br /> 2). <br /> 33) On page 6, the discussion on seeding should include timing of seeding (and <br /> planting if applicable). At what time of year will seeding operations be conducted? <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> Generally, warm and cool seed mixtures can be treated in a myriad of ways. In <br /> Table L-1 this distinction is indicated in the column labelled "C/W'. Cool season <br /> mixtures are often planted in the fall and warm in the spring, however, exceptions <br /> may apply. Some argue warm season grasses are better broadcast, while others <br /> like them drilled with the cool season grasses. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> RMneeds to revise Exhibit D to address this item and re-submit it. <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> Raptor has incorporated the First Adequacy response above into revised Exhibit E <br /> (page 6, Footnote 3). <br /> 34) The weed control paragraph (page 9) should reference the more detailed plan in <br /> Exhibit I/J. <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> We understand your preference. Exhibit I/J is an integral part of the application, <br /> and the expansion on weeds made self-evident, by virtue of your own <br /> acknowledgement that it exists there. There is a significant plan to control weeds <br /> evidenced in both exhibits. We respectfully request the matter be settled as is to <br /> avoid needless revision. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> RMneeds to revise Exhibit D to address this item and re-submit it. <br /> 391Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation —Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.