Laserfiche WebLink
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): <br /> ❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of <br /> Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements. <br /> ❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate(or foreign)commerce. <br /> ❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in"SWANCC,"the review area would have been regulated based <br /> solely on the"Migratory Bird Rule"(MBR). <br /> ❑ Waters do not meet the"Significant Nexus"standard,where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: <br /> Other: (explain, if not covered above): <br /> Reference is made to the November 13, 1986, Federal Register(Page 41217), Part 328.3(a) Non-tidal drainage and <br /> irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Ditch 1 appears to be an irrigation ditch excavated on dry land that does not <br /> appear to carry relatively permanent flows any waters of the U.S.As such,this aquatic resource is not considered <br /> jurisdictional. <br /> The resources referenced above are typically not considered waters of the U.S., however, "...the Corps reserves the right <br /> on a case-by-case basis to determine that a particular waterbody within these categories of waters is a water of the United <br /> States." [33 Fed. Reg.41217(Nov 13, 1986)]. <br /> Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area,where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is <br /> the MBR factors(i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), <br /> using best professional judgment(check all that apply): <br /> ❑ Non-wetland waters(i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft). <br /> ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. <br /> ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: <br /> El Wetlands: acres. <br /> Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the"Significant Nexus"standard, <br /> where such a finding is required for jurisdiction(check all that apply): <br /> Non-wetland waters(i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width(ft). <br /> ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. <br /> ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: <br /> ❑ Wetlands: acres. <br /> SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES. <br /> A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD(check all that apply-checked items shall be included in case file and, <br /> where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): <br /> Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aquatic Resource Delineation Report. <br /> Submitted by applicant. Dated September 20, 2022. <br /> Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. <br /> ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. <br /> ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. <br /> ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: <br /> ❑ Corps navigable waters'study: <br /> ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: <br /> ® USGS NHD data. <br /> ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. <br /> ❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale&quad name: <br /> ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: <br /> National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:1975. <br /> ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): <br /> FEMA/FIRM maps: <br /> ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) <br /> Photographs: ®Aerial (Name&Date):Google Earth: 1999-2021. USGS Aerial Photos of Colorado 1949, 1978 <br /> or❑ Other(Name&Date): <br /> Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: <br /> Applicable/supporting case law: <br /> Applicable/supporting scientific literature: <br /> Other information(please specify): <br /> B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: <br /> 7 <br />