Laserfiche WebLink
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW,and it has a significant nexus <br /> with a TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. <br /> Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area(check all that apply)- <br /> E] Tributary waters: linear feet width(ft). <br /> ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. <br /> Identify type(s)of waters: <br /> 4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br /> ❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands. <br /> Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale <br /> indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is <br /> directly abutting an RPW- <br /> E] Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow"seasonally." Provide data indicating that <br /> tributary is seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that <br /> wetland is directly abutting an RPW: <br /> Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. <br /> 5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br /> Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they <br /> are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. <br /> Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. <br /> Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. <br /> 6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. <br /> [ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are <br /> adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data <br /> supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C <br /> Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres <br /> 7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9 <br /> As a general rule,the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional. <br /> Demonstrate that impoundment was created from"waters of the U.S.,"or <br /> Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above(1-6), or <br /> Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce(see E below). <br /> E. ISOLATED[INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE]WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS,THE USE, <br /> DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH <br /> WATERS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10 <br /> ❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes <br /> from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. <br /> which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. <br /> E] Interstate isolated waters. Explain: <br /> [Q Other factors. Explain: <br /> Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: <br /> Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply): <br /> 0 Tributary waters- linear feet width(ft). <br /> M Other non-wetland waters: acres. <br /> Identify type(s)of waters, <br /> 'o, Wetlands: acres <br /> e To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook <br /> 10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category,Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and <br /> EPA HQ for review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following <br /> Rapanos. <br /> 6 <br />