My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-01-09_REVISION - M2021052 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2021052
>
2023-01-09_REVISION - M2021052 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 9:05:35 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 2:43:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021052
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/2023
Doc Name Note
Attachment F - Garfield County Land Use Permit Application
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
IHC Scott
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
CCW
ACY
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#1 �';1�4� 2022 <br /> Scott is requesting a waiver from these standards. See Section 2.8 and Section 2.9 of this <br /> application. <br /> Section 7-106. Public Utilities <br /> No additional public utilities are required for this project. There is an existing electric service <br /> connection adjacent to the property along CR 346. <br /> Section 7-107. Access and Roadways <br /> The proposed mine will be accessed using the existing private driveway off CR 346. The <br /> current access road will be improved by widening the driveway and constructing an entry <br /> apron so that trucks and other machinery will be able to enter and exit from the property with <br /> appropriate turn radii. The access road meets or exceeds minimum County standards and <br /> complies with the CDOT standards, for adequate and safe access and will support projected <br /> Average Daily Traffic(ADT) at full build out (Appendix B). <br /> Section 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards <br /> The subject property is not located within any known natural hazard areas. <br /> Section 7-109. Fire Protection <br /> Mr. Orrin Moon at the Colorado River Fire Rescue (CRFR) documented his input regarding <br /> the Rifle Gravel Pit#1 project in his letters to Mr. Patrick Waller (July 27, 2020, and January <br /> 21, 2021). Copies of these letters are included in Appendix D. In summary, Mr. Moon <br /> requested the following actions of Scott for this property: <br /> "The Scott Contracting Rifle Gravel Pit #1 shall have a Garfield County assigned <br /> address and the address numbers shall be posted at the entrance of the gravel <br /> pit...CRFR is willing to work with Scott Contracting and Garfield County (to identify an <br /> address) ..." <br /> In response to this comment, Scott will work with CRFR and Garfield County to assign an <br /> address for the Rifle Pit#1 property. Mr. Moon had the following additional comment: <br /> "Any open burning during clearing and grubbing of the gravel pit site and operation of <br /> the gravel pit shall obtain Colorado River Fire Rescue Burn Permits and State of <br /> Colorado Open Burning Permit. All pertinent permit requirements shall be followed <br /> when burning." <br /> In response to this comment, Scott will obtain a CRFR Burn Permit and State of Colorado <br /> Open Burning Permit, if needed. A burn permit is not anticipated at this time, due to the <br /> extremely limited extent of woody vegetation within the proposed area of disturbance. <br /> It should also be noted that Scott will not allow materials or wastes to deposited in areas <br /> susceptible to causing them to be transferred off the property. <br /> 2.10.2 Division 2—General Resource Protection Standards <br /> Section 7-201. Agricultural Lands <br /> The proposed mine will not have a significant negative impact on agricultural lands or <br /> operations. The Project would directly result in the permanent loss of approximately 19 acres <br /> of pastureland, which have been utilized intermittently in the past as seasonal grazing areas <br /> to support cattle operations. There would be no indirect impacts or disruptions to the <br /> surrounding pasture operations, as the Project would not affect surface water flows or <br /> 2-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.