Laserfiche WebLink
2022, necessitating a reply according to its respective item numbers from the Review, <br /> iterated in a graphical box, with our comments in blue following: <br /> Prologue <br /> The permit application has been prepared as a holistic document. We believe it would <br /> be inconsistent with the intent of the Rules and Regulations or good practice to approach <br /> it otherwise. Mining must be designed from the outset and operated through the life of <br /> the mine with closure in mind. To different degrees then, all the elements of the <br /> application are interwoven and form a narrative about the development, operation and <br /> ultimately closure of the mine. Naturally the Rules and Regulations must be segmented <br /> to at least address different elements of this process, but where the context of a <br /> discussion suggests certain discussions be combined, we have done this. There comes <br /> a point when the review will so put into fractions for purposes of style as to make the <br /> application fundamentally difficult to navigate or perform as a useful tool for compliance <br /> by the Operator. <br /> To cross reference every subject or element of the application would make the <br /> document both unwieldy and likely harder to understand and comprehend, rendering it <br /> less likely to be useful to either the operator or regulator. <br /> For example, while some information in Exhibits D and E addresses soils and vegetation, <br /> there is another exhibit completely devoted to the same. Similarly, there are <br /> independent exhibits intended to satisfy parts of Exhibit H - Wildlife Information, which <br /> may also add to the understanding of I/J Soils and Vegetation and other data. <br /> Soils and Vegetation are grouped because they are so contextually close and difficult to <br /> regard separately, so keen are their influences. This is not new and is also consistent <br /> with how we access established information of the same from SCS (NRCS) reports and <br /> data, as provided under Exhibit I/J: Soils and Vegetation Information, and maps. The <br /> vegetation, being typified according to soils, shown on the maps, fully complies with a <br /> map-based description of vegetation as it may naturally occur absent man caused <br /> modifications like agriculture or natural events like flooding or wildlife impacts, clearly <br /> evident in the aerial photographs used to enhance maps. Consequently, there are <br /> extensive references to Exhibit I/J throughout this application, in large part because <br /> soils are so integral to every aspect of the project, and it would be ungainly to <br /> repeatedly end every paragraph touching on the subject in Exhibits D, E, or others with <br /> redundant references. <br /> The same logic applies to Exhibit G: Water Information, which may also have other <br /> 2 � Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation—Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />