Laserfiche WebLink
rao � 14 <br /> 6.4.5 EXHIBIT D—Extraction Plan <br /> other; as reflected or otherwise updated as part of required 0M1R annual <br /> Reports. Under this method, extraction is 'pulsed.' As such, the rate <br /> of extraction and subsequent reclamation will slog or quicken according to <br /> influences of the markets,weather, and internal logistics. Flexibility-in <br /> Operations encourages better outcomes when adapting to changing <br /> circumstance or unexpected field conditions, and may involve actively <br /> wonting different fields or different parts of the same field as necessary. <br /> Generally, flexibility aids integrity of operations and encourages optimizing <br /> operational activity- and subsequent reclamation of affected lands. Therefore, <br /> any method that accelerates the extraction timeline uill be utilized, and <br /> should be encouraged to better engage the unpredictable elements and <br /> variables that reasonably affect the capacities of the Operator. <br /> Exhibit C-2: Extraction Plan Map, shoes the location and planned extraction <br /> limits, general direction of extraction, and related features described above; <br /> along uith features made obvious in the included aerial image of the permit <br /> location and surrounding lands. <br /> Additional information is prodded under D-hibit C-1: Existing Conditions Map.- <br /> which sho;%s all lcnmm current and active significant man-made structures <br /> located on or mthin 200 feet of the permit boundary detailed under including <br /> creeks, roads,buildings, oil and gas facilities [such as tanks,batteries,wells and <br /> lines), and pottier and communication lines and support structures, easements <br /> and rights-of-way; located over the permitted lands or uIthin 200 feet of the <br /> same_ A listing of the adjoining surface o;%mer's names and addresses located <br /> within these areas are listed under Exhibit C Text, correlated ;%nth those sho;%m <br /> in the afore-mentioned Exhibit C-1: Existing Conditions Map. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> Rol needs to clarify an apparent contradiction beta een the response to item #17 <br /> and the approach to minimizing impacts on wildlife, as required by Rule 3.1.S. On <br /> page 15, the response states that "four separate extraction teams" could be used to <br /> hasten the extraction schedule. However, the ERO memorandum (August 26, 2022; <br /> page 2) describes an incremental approach that 11111 protect mule deer habitat by <br /> only disturbing a relatively small area at one tinge. The text in the memo suggests <br /> that a maximum size for an active cell is 16 acres. This example illustrates the <br /> need to better define the mining and reclamation plans. <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> The First Adequacy response has been incorporated into the revised Exhibit D <br /> (p16, Footnote 4). Also, in revised Exhibit D, the wildlife concern has been <br /> 191 Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation—Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and S <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />