Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />• In the first case, the spring source will either be lost to the mine workings (where it will be <br />collected, treated, and eventually dischazged, as appropriate) or the spring will relocate. Relocation <br />is more likely in the upper portion of the fractured zone, as discussed previously in Section 2.05.6. <br />Map 37 shows all spring locations within the permit area. B and E Seam overburden information is <br />provided on Map 14 and Map 19, respectively. A review of these maps show that there are no <br />springs with less than 270 feet of overburden cover in the South of Divide mining azea <br />In the second situation (spring and/or spring source within 100 feet of ground surface), the spring <br />flow will not be lost to the mine workings unless the bedrock source is within 270 vertical feet of <br />the B or E Seam mine workings and within the subsidence angle of draw (i.e., 10 to 20 degrees). <br />Assuming there is a separation distance of greater than 270 feet, the water-bearing bedrock unit <br />could be disrupted only by surface or tension cracks which develop over the chain or barrier pillazs, <br />thus potentially diverting the groundwater into deeper permeable units. The effect of such an event <br />would likely be to permanently displace the spring to adown-gradient location where a deeper <br />permeable unit is exposed to the surface. Alternatively, the surface crack will, with time, become <br />saturated or will "heaUseal" itself and the temporarily disrupted spring will again flow. The key <br />point to recognize regazding surface cracks is that their occurrence is infrequent. <br />In both cases described above, the groundwater diverted as a consequence of mining will not be lost <br />from the drainage system. In the first case, the groundwater will be collected in the mine workings, <br />pumped to the surface, treated, and eventually discharged to the North Fork or Dry Fork in <br />compliance with the existing NPDES permit. In the second case, the groundwater may be <br />permanently relocated to adown-gradient location or temporarily stored in asubsidence-induced <br />surface crack. None-the-less, the groundwater will remain as part of the historic drainage. Spring <br />flow observations in the general vicinity of the BEM and 14HG Faults have not shown <br />unchazacteristic changes as a result of the mine inflows. <br />Underground Water Storage <br />As a result of the unprecedented inflows of groundwater into the mine from the BEM and 14HG <br />Faults (see previous discussion under Mine Inflows), MCC began using the space provided by <br />the previous mining of longwall panels 1NW through 7NW for temporary storage. As more <br />information was obtained relative to the volume and chazacteristics of this groundwater inflow, a <br />decision was made to continue the use of this storage azea or sump. In fact, this use of storage <br />resulting from previous longwall mining is to be utilized in other portions of the mine (i.e., the <br />NE and Box Canyon Longwall Panels). This section of the permit text is provided to describe the <br />Bumping of water within West Elk Mine and to discuss the associated PHC's. <br />It is important to differentiate between the depressions in open entries (or operational sumps) <br />constructed within most mines to collect the day-to-day groundwater inflows and operational <br />runoff water (usually of small volume) and the serendipitous use of storage created by the <br />previous mining of coal in strategically located down-dip portions of the mine (or sealed panels <br />sumps). These local collection azeas aze herein refen•ed to as "small capacity sumps" and "lazge <br />capacity sumps," respectively. <br />1.05-277 Revised June 1005 PRlO; Rev. Masch 2006; Rev. May 1006 PRIO <br />