Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />wells 23-H-1 (B Seam), 23-H-3 (F Seam), and 23-H-4 (Barren Member). Water depths in the other <br />three wells are at various levels, typically 100 to 200 feet above the completion interval. These data <br />indicate the erratic nature of groundwater occurrence and the lack of interconnected water-bearing <br />zones in the Mesaverde Formation. We1196-27-1 was completed in the fall of 1996. Baseline data <br />for this well has been collected and is available in the 1997 and subsequent Annual Hydrology <br />Reports. In 2003, three additional E Seam monitoring wells were constructed. These include <br />Sec 3 E Seam Well, SOM-3-E, and 1-11-1-E which were constructed to provide baseline <br />monitoring data. <br />Conceptually, it is useful to visualize the following subsurface disturbance pattern for two-seam <br />mining as illustrated in Figure 21. In this case, the B and E Seam are being mined. The B Seam is <br />typically 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet under the ground surface in the Apache Rocks mining azea while <br />the E Seam is typically at a depth of 800 to 1,000 feet. This indicates that the typical sepazation <br />distance between the B and E Seam is 200 feet. Consequently, as the E Seam is mined, a caved <br />zone 30 feet above the top of the seam will develop, along with a fractured zone extending up <br />another 220 feet. This will place the combined caved/fractured zone up to 250 feet above the E <br />Seam. Following E Seam mining, the B Seam will be mined. A total thickness of subsurface <br />disturbance of approximately 450 feet can be calculated by adding the height of caved/fractured <br />zone above the E Seam to the interburden distance between the B Seam and E Seam. The <br />interburden distance was used instead of the caved/fractured zone above the B Seam, since the <br />caved/fractured zone above the B Seam overlaps with the caved/fracture zone above the E Seam. <br />Any groundwater within this 450-foot thickness may be disrupted and if such groundwater feeds <br />springs/seeps, the springs/seeps aze likely to be affected, also. With respect to surface flow impacts, <br />however, the minimum separation thickness between the top of the E Seam fractured zone and the <br />ground surface is 150 feet, which means that surface flows (including springs) aze insulated from <br />the caved and fractured zones by a minimum of 150 feet. <br />Based on the available data, experience in the F and B Seams, and general knowledge of the <br />Mesaverde Formation, mining in the E Seam is not expected to have significant impacts on the <br />groundwater systems within the permit azea. <br />Inter-relationships Between Groundwater and Snrinps <br />The probable hydrologic consequences of B and E Seam mining and the expected subsidence <br />effects on springs was previously discussed in Section 2.05.6. As discussed in that section, springs <br />which are supplied by water-bearing bedrock units are at greater risk of relocation or dry-up as a <br />consequence of longwall mining if: (1) The source bedrock unit is within the combined subsidence <br />caved and fractured zone (approximately 270 feet above the B or E Seam mine workings, based on <br />a conservative estimate by Mr. Dunrud), or (2) The bedrock unit from which a spring discharge is <br />within approximately 100 feet of the surface and continuous across a chain or bamer pillaz (100 feet <br />is a conservative projection by Mr. Dunrud of the maximum depth of surface cracks). <br /> <br />2.05-276 Revised June 2005 PRIG; Rev. March 1006; Rev. May 2006 PRIG <br />