Laserfiche WebLink
South Hinsdale Response to Objections � � <br /> 12 July 2022 <br /> 3.40 Tom and Paula Lackey <br /> Seems very similar to objections to DRMS by other entities <br /> List of two (2) claims and three (3) objections. <br /> Claims: See Section 5.11 <br /> (1) Claim: same individual who attempted to obtain a similar permit near Lake Hatcher <br /> See Section 5.11.9 <br /> (2) Claim: "individual" apparently believed to be Ronnie Urbanczyk based on "Texas" <br /> remark. See Section 5.11.9 <br /> Objections: <br /> (1) Objection: traffic safety— Piedra Road See Section 5.3 <br /> (2) Objection: road conditions — Piedra Road, both roadway and residential areas, noise <br /> and dust, health impacts, cost of repairing road, conflict with visitor traffic See Section 5.3 <br /> especially Section 5.3.2. <br /> (3) Objection: wildlife—trucks killing wildlife See Section 5.6. <br /> 3.41 Barry Knott <br /> 63 Bennett Court, Pagosa Springs <br /> List of one (1) objection. <br /> (1) Objection: location —general negative impacts—traffic, noise, safety, wildlife, tourism, <br /> and enjoyment of the area These general comments have responses in the various <br /> elements of Section 5. <br /> 3.42 Art Dilione <br /> Similar to his DRMS objections and addressed together with those in <br /> Section 2.10 <br /> Most of Mr. Dilione's comments and objections are addressed in Section 2.10, based on his <br /> correspondence with DRMS. Most of his comments to Hinsdale County are those same issues. <br /> As with other commenters, his objections are not all jurisdictional for DRMS. Those include issues <br /> regarding Piedra Road, traffic, financing, and socio-economic impacts. Because of the complexity <br /> of Mr. Dilione's comments, please see Appendix D for cross-indexing of his comments to the <br /> DRMS and the County. <br /> In this Section 3.42, we respond to four of his comments not made to DRMS or elaborated on in <br /> his County comments. <br /> County Specific Comment 4) — wildlife and location - restates Mr. Dilione's objection to DRMS <br /> and also cites the CPW comments. <br /> Response: Per conversations between Mr. Lucas West (DRMS), Mr. Peter Foote (CPW) <br /> and Nathan Barton, preparer, the CPW is willing to waive this recommended 500-foot <br /> exclusion zone provided there is adequate protection to prevent surface water with <br /> sediment from entering the Piedra River, and since there is not drilling and blasting. See <br /> Sections 4.2 and 5.2 <br /> 5182-22-003 WAST£LIN£, INC. Page 55 of 107 <br />