Laserfiche WebLink
To: Mr. Peter HaN s <br /> Date: Fcbruar,� ?1. 202 <br /> Paue 23 <br /> Response 7 <br /> The Inlet Protection Calculations incorrectly referenced Exhibit C instead of Exhibit F. <br /> Please see the plan view and sections on Attachment 6 Sheet F-3, and Attachment 14 for <br /> the location and design of the riprapped inlet weirs. <br /> Comment 8 <br /> Please elaborate on item 6 on page 7. Do the modeling results indicate the flows from <br /> backwater conditions will be low enough that additional bank protection (e.g., riprap) will <br /> not be needed, and vegetation will be sufficient? <br /> Response 8 <br /> Please see the inlet/outlet protection calculations presented in Attachment 14. The analysis <br /> found that hard armoring(riprap)is only required for the pit inlets where shear stresses are <br /> in excess of 2.1 lb/ft2 and that revegetation using the wetland seed mix presented in <br /> Attachment 4 is adequate for lower shear stresses. <br /> 20220209_1045_DRMS_Adequacy_Review_Response_MASTE <br /> R.docx TELEST® <br />