My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-02-23_PERMIT FILE - M2021059 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021059
>
2022-02-23_PERMIT FILE - M2021059 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2025 5:12:23 AM
Creation date
2/23/2022 9:33:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021059
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/23/2022
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Telesto
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Mr. Peter Elms <br /> Date: February 21. 2022 <br /> Page 12 <br /> 6.4.18 Exhibit R - Proof of Filing with County Clerk and Recorder <br /> Comment 28 <br /> Please provide an affidavit or receipt indicating the date on which the revised application <br /> information required to address this adequacy letter was placed with the Weld County <br /> Clerk and Recorder for public review,pursuant to Subparagraph 1.6.2(1)(c). <br /> Response 28 <br /> Please see Attachment 10. <br /> 6.4.19 Exhibit S - Permanent Man-made Structures <br /> Comment 29 <br /> Where the affected lands are within two hundred(200)feet of any significant, valuable and <br /> permanent man-made structures, the Applicant may either: <br /> a. provide a notarized agreement between the Applicant and the person(s) having <br /> an interest in the structure, that the Applicant is to provide compensation for any <br /> damage to the structure; or <br /> b. where such an agreement cannot be reached, the Applicant shall provide an <br /> appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall <br /> not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation; or <br /> c. where such structure is a utility, the Applicant may supply a notarized letter, <br /> on utility letterhead,from the owners) of the utility that the mining and <br /> reclamation activities, as proposed, will have "no negative effect"on their utility. <br /> The Division will require the Applicant to demonstrate they attempted to obtain notarized <br /> structure agreements with all owners of the structures within 200 feet of the affected area <br /> of the proposed mine site,pursuant to Rule 6.4.19,prior to the Division's consideration of <br /> a stability analysis. <br /> Response 29 <br /> LRM initiated item (a) with adjacent landowner (now including those identified in <br /> Comment 29 that are within the 200' boundary), and have not received confirmation or <br /> signed agreements. LRM also completed (b), as Appendix B in the updated filing of the <br /> 112c Permit Application. <br /> Comment 29 <br /> The Division did not receive proof of notification for the following permanent man-made <br /> structures owners within 200 feet of the boundary of the affected land as identified by the <br /> 20220209 1045_DRMS_Adeguacy_Review_Response_MASTE <br /> Rdocx TELEST© <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.