My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-05-27_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2021-05-27_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2021 8:35:57 AM
Creation date
10/20/2021 8:32:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/27/2021
Doc Name
Geotechnical Stability Report For Highwall Mining At the Colowyo Coal Mine
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 23, Item 1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 21, 2014 Page 55 <br />Table 8. Input Parameters Used for the LAMODEL Analyses <br />Young's modulus (rock) (psi) <br />E Seam <br />F Seam <br />Cover depth range (ft) <br />120 -400 <br />142 -422 <br />1 E to F interburden thickness (ft) <br />1 <br />15 <br />Design coal strength (psi) <br />900 <br />900 <br />Modeled coal strength (psi) <br />varies <br />900 <br />Young's modulus (coal) (psi) <br />330,000 <br />290,000 <br />Poisson's ratio (coal) <br />0.30 <br />0.25 <br />Young's modulus (rock) (psi) <br />676,000 <br />Poisson's ratio (cock) <br />0.25 <br />Lamination thickness (inches) <br />600 <br />Vertical stress gradient (psi/ft) <br />1 <br />Design opening width (ft) <br />11.5 <br />Modeled opening width (ft) <br />11.5 <br />Element size (inches) <br />34.5 <br />Number of yielding stages (material types) <br />10 <br />Web pillar width (no. of elements, typical) <br />3-4 <br />Barrier pillar width (no. of elements, typical) <br />9 <br />pillars. As an extreme case, the E Seam in -situ strength was decreased to 605 psi to simulate <br />complete collapse of the highwall mining panels (Figure 36). Loads are transferred from the <br />collapsed pillars to intact abutment zones, either on the panel periphery, or in areas where <br />highwall mining did not fully penetrate. The resulting stresses imparted to the underlying F <br />Seam are shown in Figure 37. Stresses below the E Seam abutments are three to four times the <br />overburden stress. Due to the age of the E Seam mining (approximately 7 years) and the <br />inability to assess the current stability of E Seam pillars, AAI considers the risks of highwall <br />mining the F Seam below these workings to be high. Pillar design could be performed <br />accounting for the worst -case stress concentrations indicated in Figure 37; however, pillar widths <br />approaching 40 ft would be required. <br />6.0 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS <br />The design curves presented in Figures 29 through 33 provide Colowyo with a rational <br />starting point for highwall web and barrier pillar layout. By using these design curves to <br />determine the minimum pillar width for each panel as mining progresses, and adjusting that <br />width as conditions warrant, maximum resource recovery can be attained. Based on the <br />observations and analyses discussed in this report, the following recommendations for <br />implementation of the design are made. <br />Mining Sequence —The lowest seams in each pit will be mined first, with backfill placed <br />to the floor elevation of the next highwall mining target seam. Advancing highwall miner <br />openings uphill in the pit (from north to south in South Taylor and from east to west in the West <br />Pit) is recommended as it will leave any water drainage or accumulation behind the mining. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.