My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-05-27_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2021-05-27_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2021 8:35:57 AM
Creation date
10/20/2021 8:32:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/27/2021
Doc Name
Geotechnical Stability Report For Highwall Mining At the Colowyo Coal Mine
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 23, Item 1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 21, 2014 Page 54 <br />In applying the design charts of Figures 29 through 33, it is recommended that the highest <br />anticipated mining height in the panel be used. The depth of cover can be chosen based on a <br />weighted average as follows: <br />Design Depth = 0.75(maximum depth) + 0.25(minimum depth) (Eqn. 7) <br />In determining the minimum depth, engineering judgment should be used, for example <br />the minimum depth could be chosen based on the minimum depth beyond the highwall crest, or <br />beyond the first bench in the highwall, as appropriate. <br />5.0 NUMERICAL MODELING ANALYSIS <br />Due to the extensive history of highwall mining at Colowyo, and the fact that many <br />similar scenarios to the proposed mining have been modeled previously, AAI did not perform <br />numerical modeling for sample panel designs in the current study. However, one area of planned <br />mining was of sufficient concern that a simple numerical analysis was performed. In the West <br />Pit, Colowyo has projected highwall mining panels in the F Seam below E Seam panels that <br />were previously mined at right angles to the planned mining (Figure 14). Depending on the <br />current condition of the E Seam web and barrier pillars, a range of stress conditions in the <br />unmined F Seam below (with an interburden thickness between 15 ft and 25 ft) are possible. To <br />explore these stress conditions, LAMODEL numerical modeling of the as -mined E Seam <br />highwall miner openings, and the unmined (pre- mining) F Seam was performed. Overmining of <br />the previous E Seam panels does not pose a great concern, as the D2 Seam is too thin in this area <br />to highwall mine, and the C Seam is distant from the E Seam (the C -E interburden ranges from <br />70 to 120 ft) <br />LAMODEL (short for laminated model) is a non - linear boundary- element displacement <br />discontinuity code for estimating stress, displacement, and yielding in tabular deposits such as <br />coal (Heasley and Salamon 1996). LAMODEL was developed by the former U.S. Bureau of <br />Mines (USBM), now part of the National Institute of Safety and Health (NIOSH). It has the <br />ability to handle in -seam materials based on both linear and nonlinear mechanical (stress - strain) <br />behaviors. The geometry of the model is variable; thus, incremental model changes can be used <br />to determine optimal mining sequences, as well as the impact of varying pillar sizes, variations in <br />cover load, and seam interaction effects. The programs perform an iterative procedure to solve a <br />set of equations representing the stress -strain state of each element in a grid representing the <br />mine geometry, until a steady -state equilibrium is reached (loads no longer transfer). <br />For the analysis, a two -seam (F and E) model was run. Actual cover depth over the area <br />was used. Model parameters are given in Table 8. <br />In the models, the strength of the E Seam coal was reduced from its design strength of <br />900 psi to simulate what may occur with pillar deterioration over time. With an in -situ strength <br />of 684 psi, (Figure 34), web and barrier pillar remain stable. Stresses imparted to the underlying <br />F Seam (Figure 35) increase slightly compared to the overburden stress that would occur if the E <br />Seam were not mined. These stress increases are on the order of 20 psi beneath E Seam barrier <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.