My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-09-27_REVISION - M1990057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1990057
>
2021-09-27_REVISION - M1990057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2025 2:02:19 AM
Creation date
9/27/2021 4:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/27/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
The Union Milling Contractors
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dustin Czapla 17 <br /> CDRMS <br /> September 24,2021 <br /> b. Details regarding how the concrete foundation and containment structures <br /> were designed and built, including any coatings applied to the floor and or <br /> walls. <br /> Response <br /> The structure was designed and built under the authority of the Lake County building <br /> department, with the appropriate permits and inspections. Coatings will be applied to areas <br /> such as floors and sumps which will potentially see chemical laden liquids. <br /> c. If available, provide any QA/QC documentation for the construction. <br /> Response <br /> No QA/QC other than a Certificate of Occupancy exist for the older parts of the structure, but <br /> inspection reports for newer construction are available, along with drawings certified by <br /> professional engineers. <br /> d. Drawings and narrative of piping and delivery systems of designated <br /> chemicals, verification that the entire length of delivery lines exist within a form <br /> of secondary containment. <br /> Response <br /> Piping within the structure will be protected by secondary containment, and pipes passing <br /> between the main building and the leach area will be double walled. Any vessel will be <br /> protected by a sump, equal or greater in volume than the largest vessel in the area. Should a <br /> major leak occur for the leach tanks, secondary containment will be the TSF, which is directly <br /> adjacent to the leach tanks, via a pipe. Detailed drawings of piping routs will be supplied upon <br /> completion of the design. <br /> 2. Secondary and tertiary containment structures <br /> a. Details regarding the secondary containment structures. This should include <br /> calculations demonstrating maximum containment volumes of each area, as <br /> well as details regarding sump systems and where they report to. <br /> Response <br /> The main building stair steps down a natural slope, which allows us to employ a sump at the <br /> lowest point of the building. This sump is sufficient to contain the volume of the largest vessel in <br /> the building. This sump, if overwhelmed by a catastrophic rupture event, ultimately reports via <br /> pipe to the TSF. The sump will be able to contain approximately 6,800 gallons, which is larger <br /> than the largest vessel (See Volumes Table 4). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.