My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-09-16_REVISION - M1983033
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1983033
>
2021-09-16_REVISION - M1983033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2025 7:35:53 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 8:51:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983033
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/16/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Albert Frei & Sons Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mining Methods and Slope Stability Evaluation for Expanded Development of the Walstrum Aggregate Quarry <br /> The overall shape of drill patterns will affect rock movement relief, which in turn influences <br /> fragmentation and the stability of temporary mining benches. Blast relief for bench blasts is <br /> improved when hole patterns are angled to reduce corner confinement. When square or <br /> rectangular patterns are used, the rock moving out of tight corners often tears away large chunks <br /> of material beyond the planned end of the blast. This "End Break" can create large boulders and <br /> excessive toe burdens are inherited by the next shot. Figures 4.4 and 4.5 show pattern layout <br /> examples illustrating the typical effects of square versus angled blasthole patterns. <br /> Tight Corner <br /> Causal excessive j • • • • • • • • • • • • <br /> End Break and j <br /> Boulders at Crest ` • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • Last <br /> Shot <br /> L `• • • • • • • • • • <br /> Exceaslve Burden from <br /> Previous End-break <br /> Causes Boulders at Toe <br /> Rectangular Shots Can Cause End-Break Problems <br /> Figure 4.4—Excessive end-break caused by designing blasts with tight corners <br /> Reduced End ,..-.._.._,�•.;�.c-,_......--..___,•-- ,.___.~-_.._..�_.�.._. <br /> Break When • • • • • • • • • • • <br /> Shot Follows \rirud anh�np• <br /> Natural Break, • • • • • • • • • • • • <br /> // • • • • • • • • • • • • Shoot <br /> Proper Hde Placemanty <br /> F Less Crest Backbreak <br /> For Previous Shot <br /> Reducing End-Break with Angled Shot Ends. <br /> Figure 4.5 —Reducing end-break by designing blasts with angled corners <br /> Blasts should also be designed to avoid causing excessive vibrations, which can damage or <br /> weaken rock slopes. Blast timing sequences should also provide adequate delay time between <br /> successive rows of holes. Experience and controlled studies have proven that damage to the final <br /> REVEY Associates,Inc. Page I I of 14 October,2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.