My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-06-24_REVISION - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2021-06-24_REVISION - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2021 1:16:54 PM
Creation date
6/24/2021 12:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/24/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
Ouray Silver Mines, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR14
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ouray Silver Mines, Inc. <br /> 1900 Main St. Unit 1 <br /> PO Box 564 <br /> Ouray,CO 81427 <br /> `RAY S1LL'FR M1JIl <br /> To: Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, & Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman St. Rm. 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> June 22, 2021 <br /> Dear Mr. West <br /> Ouray Silver Mines Inc. (OSMI) received Adequacy Review-3 for Technical Revision 14 to Permit <br /> M2012-032 for the Revenue-Virginius Mine(Mine). The Adequacy Review raised 21 major points, each <br /> of which are addressed in italics under headings that repeat the DRMS point of clarification. A list of <br /> tables and attachments added to this Adequacy Review Response is found below: <br /> Updated Table 1. Volume of Reagents <br /> Updated Table 4. Reagent Information <br /> Updated Table 5. Containment Volumes <br /> Updated Table 6. Dosing Rates <br /> Updated Table 7. Pipe Drain Volumes <br /> Updated Table 8. Reagents in Tailings <br /> Table 9. Reagent Venders <br /> ASME B31 Standard <br /> AWS D1.1 Standard <br /> 1. The Division is amenable to allowing alternative chemicals so long as they are <br /> comparable. The Division will allow up to two alternatives (three total chemicals to be used <br /> interchangeably). If in the future, a different chemical type or comparable alternative is needed, a <br /> Technical Revision shall first be submitted and approved prior to switching. <br /> Response: Comment is acknowledged. However, if the Division is agreeable, we would propose using the <br /> quarterly mill report identified in Comment 10 to update the chemical list. <br /> 2. Attached is the Division's table 1 summarizing the chemicals proposed to date. If the manufacturer <br /> name is in red,the MSDS has not been provided to the Division, please see question XXXX. In the <br /> case where more than 3 alternatives have been provided please indicate which manufacturer will <br /> be your second and third choices. Similarly other manufacturers were proposed in early <br /> submissions but not mentioned in Adequacy Response#2 Table 4. Update/complete this table. <br /> Response:At this time, the mine will start the mill with the chemicals listed in the attached Table 9 which <br /> is an update to the Division's table 1. All tables that contain information regarding reagents have been <br /> updated to the list found in Table 9. <br /> 3. Several new chemicals have been proposed within Adequacy Response #2. MSDS' need to be <br /> provided for any and all chemicals in which OSMI proposes to house within the reagent room. <br /> a. Update tables accordingly. Include new/alternatives throughout all documents. <br /> b. Once MSDS for primary and alternatives are received, the Division will verify that the <br /> proposed alternatives are comparable and have similar environmental and health risks. <br /> Phone: (970)325-9830 ♦ Fax: (970)325-9824 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.