My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-06-14_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2021-06-14_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2025 7:28:02 AM
Creation date
6/15/2021 7:01:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/14/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ouray Silver Mines, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A490t., <br /> CAL'R4}'SILVER NIAES <br /> returned to the milling process by design. OSMI has responded to each of your <br /> specific questions below. <br /> a. 40 CFR Part 261.4(a)(17) specifically excludes materials within the primary <br /> mineral processing industry,from which minerals, acids, cyanides, water or other <br /> values are recovered, from the definition of a solid waste and therefore this <br /> material is not considered a hazardous waste. 40 CFR Part 261.4(a)(17)(iii)goes <br /> on to state that these materials may be stored within tanks, containers or buildings <br /> provided such buildings are designed, constructed and operated to prevent <br /> significant release to the environment. <br /> The mine's SPCC plan defines a spill as something that escapes into the <br /> environment. Since the material is not leaving secondary containment, it is not <br /> considered a spill. It is also not being returned to the original container. Rather <br /> this material is collected in sumps and is put back into the mill process. The sumps <br /> within the mill and reagent buildings are incorporated as part of the overall <br /> concentrating process by design to capture both ore and process water and return <br /> to the milling process to enhance recovery. <br /> b. See response to Comment I5.a. <br /> C. <br /> i. Thank you for pointing out this discrepancy. The flocculant sump reports <br /> to the flocculant mixing tank and the lime sump reports to the tailing <br /> thickener tank as an industry standard design, which was completed by <br /> Barr Engineering. <br /> ii. Water and residual materials remaining in tanks during final reclamation <br /> will be tested and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 261 (RCRA <br /> Regulations) and Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations. <br /> d. The sump located in the lime containment area is for lime. Outside of the <br /> designated containment areas the floor of the reagent room is sloped to have a low <br /> point in the middle as shown on drawing 700-GA-001. A floor sump will be used <br /> to collect material in this area. Depending on the chemical and nature of the <br /> material, the sump will report back to the mixing tank and be reintroduced to the <br /> process. <br /> e. Drawing 500-PI-001 is attached and shows the lime sump reporting to the Tailings <br /> Thickener Tanks. <br /> 16. Please indicate the anticipated total volume of processed water to be stored on <br /> site at any given time pursuant to Rule 6.4.21(6)(b)(i). Is there a storage tank <br /> location or is the total volume stored throughout the piping of the facility and the <br /> various equipment? <br /> 11 Pae <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.