My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-05-12_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2021-05-12_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 6:12:06 AM
Creation date
5/17/2021 6:11:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/12/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ouray Silver Mines, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR12
Email Name
LJW
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADZ Laboratories, Inc. • • - • ~ • <br /> 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800)334-5493 o 0 <br /> ACZ Project ID: L65443 <br /> METHOD!ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER QUAL DESCRIPTION <br /> Toluene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> trans-1,2-Dichloroethene M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> trans-1,3-Dichloropropene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> Trichloroethene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> Trichlorofluoromethane M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> Vinyl Acetate M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> M8260C/D GUMS VB CCV recovery was outside of acceptance limits.See Case <br /> Narrative. <br /> Vinyl Chloride M8260C/D GCiMS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> L65443-03 WG517626 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 1,1,1-Trichloroethane M826OC/D GUMS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,1,2-Trichloroethane M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,1-Dichloroethane M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 1,1-Dichloroethene M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,1-Dichloropropene M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 1,2,3-Trichloropropane M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br /> L65443-2105101543 Page 29 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.