Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />The hole selection for collection of the overburden and interburden rock for physio -chemical analysis <br />used the Division's Guidelines for the Collection of Baseline Water Quality and Overhurden <br />Geochemistry as a basis for selecting the sampling hole and location. The purpose of the physio -chemical <br />analyses is to determine the chemical composition and assess the acid-forming, toxic -forming, or <br />alkalinity -producing potential of overburden and interburden material within the Collom permit <br />expansion area. <br />The Division's Guidelines recommend sampling one hole per square mile, with a minimum of three per <br />permit area. The drill holes that were selected are distributed sufficiently to meet this criterion for the <br />Collom Pit. <br />The holes selected to be overburden/interburden core holes were: C-04-04, C-04-14, C-04-25, C-04-36, <br />C-05-26, and C-05-32. These drill holes are near or within the footprint of the Collom Pit. The locations <br />of the core holes are shown on Map I IB and the data is summaried in Exhibit 6, Item 9. Logs of drill <br />holes and test borings within the Collom project area can be found in Exhibit 6, Item 10 (Geologic Data <br />for Collom Cross Sections — Drill Hole Information). <br />Each hole was continuously cored, which produced an approximately 3" diameter rock sample. The <br />continuous core extended from near surface to a depth which equaled or exceeded the depth of the lowest <br />most seam to be mined. Coring depths ranged from near ground surface to between approximately 450 <br />feet and 818 feet in depth. The samples were bagged, boxed and secured prior to transportation to the <br />laboratory for analysis. <br />Following collection of the rock core from each core hole, the core log was analyzed along with the core <br />photographs to select lithologic similar rock. A data sheet was prepared by Colowyo consulting <br />geologists detailing each rock layer. On the data sheet was the rock type, upper and lower depths, core <br />thickness, depth and thickness adjustment to the downhole geophysical log, and the bag and box number <br />the rock was located. This was transmitted to the analyzing laboratory for their use in breaking out the <br />rock for analysis. <br />Sample thickness ranged from approximately one foot to 15 feet and averaged 5 feet. A total of 619 <br />discrete samples were collected and analyzed to characterize approximately 4,212 feet of overburden. All <br />coal beds encountered in the continuous core, greater than one (1) foot in thickness, were removed for <br />separate coal analysis. <br />The following analyses and sample preparation were performed on overburden and coal samples: <br />Physicochemical Analysis and Methods <br />• pH, sat paste <br />• Electrical Conductivity @ 25 C <br />• Saturation <br />• Texture <br />• Ca (sat paste) <br />• Mg (sat paste) <br />• Na (sat paste) <br />• SAR <br />• Cation Exchange Capacity <br />• Exchangeable Na <br />• Exchangeable Sodium percent <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 16 <br />USDA No.60 (21A) <br />EPA Method M 120. 1 -meter,w/sat paste <br />USDA No. 60 (2) <br />ASTM D 422 Hydrometer <br />EPA Method M6010 ICP <br />EPA Method M6010 ICP <br />EPA Method M6010 ICP <br />calculation <br />NH40ac, USDA No. 60 (19) <br />NH40ac extractable, M6010B ICP <br />Exchangeable Na/CEC <br />Revision Date: 4/7/17 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />