My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-02-01_REPORT - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2021-02-01_REPORT - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2021 6:03:44 AM
Creation date
5/7/2021 5:53:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/1/2021
Doc Name Note
2020 Annual Hydrology Report
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2020
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.2 SAGE CREEK <br /> Analytical results for the 2020 surface water monitoring conducted at Sage Creek <br /> stream point WSSF3 is provided in Table D.7 of Appendix D and the analytical results <br /> for the two outfalls that report to Sage Creek outfalls are included in Table D.B. <br /> There were no exceedances of any NPDES permit limits or Yampa Segment 13e water <br /> quality standards at the two Sage Creek NPDES Outfalls in 2020. Total recoverable <br /> iron exceeded the Yampa Segment 13e surface water quality standard twice at WSSF3 <br /> in 2020. The iron in these samples (1.04 - 1.47 mg/L) was just above the water quality <br /> standard. The pH in both samples was alkaline but the total suspended solids (range: <br /> 31 - 44 mg/L; mean: 37.5 mg/L) was elevated relative to historic levels (range: 2010- <br /> 2019: <5 - 21 mg/L; mean: 9.5 mg/L). The SIIW drainage area that reports to Sage <br /> Creek has been vegetated and stable for over a decade and the slightly elevated iron <br /> may be the result of natural erosion in the unaffected portions of the watershed or <br /> the sampler could have accidentally disturbed the base of the stream channel while <br /> collecting the sample. As discussed in Section 4.1, the lab used by SCC has a method <br /> detection limit for mercury and sulfide that are above the Segment 13e water quality <br /> standard. None of the samples collected from WSSF3 in 2020 exceed the labs mercury <br /> or sulfide method detection limit. <br /> In the Probable Hydrological Consequences (PHC, Tab 17) section of the SIIW PAP, <br /> predictions were made for the expected TDS increases to be observed at several <br /> stream points. The following table outlines these predictions along with this year's <br /> average concentration. <br /> Stream Point Predicted TDS (mg/L) Mean TDS (mg/L)* <br /> WSHF1 2527 2340 <br /> WSD5 2451 1820 <br /> WSSF3 1 626** 1 945 <br /> * Duplicates removed from average calculation <br /> ** Predicted TDS value does not account for later contributions from Yoast Mine (C-1994-082). <br /> Predicted TDS concentration at WSSF3 in Yoast Mine PHC is 2118 mg/L. <br /> The annual average TDS measured at Dry Creek monitoring points WSHF1 and WSD5 <br /> were below the concentrations predicted in the SIIW PHC. Although the TDS at Sage <br /> Page 13 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.