My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-04-30_REVISION - M1997058
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997058
>
2021-04-30_REVISION - M1997058
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 9:40:27 AM
Creation date
5/3/2021 7:51:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997058
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/30/2021
Doc Name
Request for TR03
From
Hall-Irwin Aggregates, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR3
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Scott- DNR, Eric<eric.scott@state.co.us> <br /> Sent:Wednesday, March 24, 20219:40 AM <br /> To: Ed Lafferty<ELafferty@hall-irwin.com> <br /> Subject: Re: FW: DRMS Baseline Permit <br /> Ed- <br /> I'm no real estate attorney, but that makes sense to me I guess... If you can just provide that <br /> explanation (attny approved of course) with a copy of the lease in the TR I'm sure that will work <br /> fine. Thanks. <br /> Eric Scott <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist, P.G., R.G. <br /> P 303.866.3567 x 8140 1 F 303.832.8106 <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br /> eric.scott@state.co.us I http://drms.colorado.gov <br /> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 4:58 PM Ed Lafferty<ELafferty@hall-irwin.com>wrote: <br /> Good afternoon Eric, <br /> I received your voice mail and have reached out to our legal team and herein is the response given back <br /> to me. Legally,just because Al purchased the property does not remove any of our rights under the <br /> original Mine Lease as it is a recorded document. Further,from a legal standpoint if someone could <br /> come in and buy a property that had a Mine Lease prerecorded in place and not allow the Miner right of <br /> entry, they would be effectively stealing right away from the miner or have a strong bargaining position <br /> that would be unfair enrichment.Anyway, I will call you tomorrow morning to discuss since I will not be <br /> free for at least another hour plus this will get you a chance to digest. <br /> Thanks <br /> Sd Z404 <br /> Wall-qu,6, ea04aat" <br /> elzd 10) all-67 a .e4m <br /> OkCm 970-5V-6909 <br /> cell 970-539-1336 <br /> tu►�.�-z awe <br /> co�rae.risr <br /> M1997-058 EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.