My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2021-03-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2021 6:44:30 AM
Creation date
3/30/2021 1:30:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/25/2021
Doc Name Note
For SL6
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Property LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vegetation which supports the approved postmining land use and which meets the approved success <br /> standard for cover...based on statistically valid data collected during a single year of the liability <br /> period". <br /> And,regarding Phase II bond release,Rule 3.03.2(3)(b)also states: <br /> "No more than sixty(60)percent of the bond shall be released so long as the lands to which the <br /> release would be applicable are contributing suspended solids to stream flow or runoff outside the <br /> permit area in excess of premining levels as determined by baseline data or in excess of levels <br /> determined on adjacent nonmined areas". <br /> And at Phase III Rule 3.03.1(2)(c) states that: <br /> the final portion of performance bond,"shall be released when the permittee has successfully <br /> completed all surface coal mining reclamation operations in accordance with this approved <br /> reclamation plan,and the final inspection procedures of 3.03.2 have been satisfied. This shall not be <br /> before the expiration of the period specified for revegetation responsibility in 3.02.3." <br /> Rule 3.03.1(4) states: <br /> "No bond shall be fully released until all reclamation requirements of these Rules and the Act are <br /> fully met... The same rule goes on to state,"No acreage shall be released from the permit area until <br /> all surface coal mining and reclamation operations on that acreage have been completed in <br /> accordance with the approved reclamation plan." <br /> Permit Requirements: Success Standards <br /> The Seneca IIW Mine reclamation plan calls for a minimum of four feet of suitable plant growth medium, <br /> including an average of 1.3 feet of topsoil to be placed on graded lands prior to revegetation(Permit Tab 21). <br /> Drainage control at the site comprises armored reconstructed drainages,sedimentation ponds and stock tanks <br /> as well as various secondary containment measures including check dams,diversion ditches, sediment <br /> sumps,contour ditches,riprap,and vegetative sediment filters among other methods. Sedimentation ponds <br /> have all been designed to meet State and Federal regulations and to provide storage and treatment for runoff <br /> resulting from 10 year 24 hour precipitation events. <br /> Protection of the hydrologic balance at the site comprises ground water and surface water monitoring for <br /> water quantity and water quality. The natural ground waters at the Seneca IIW mine comprise high <br /> concentrations of dissolved minerals and solids. It is expected that spoil utilized in reclamation will affect <br /> ground water quality as TDS (total dissolved solids),trends increase over baseline levels. Seven sediment <br /> ponds are utilized for controlling surface runoff from disturbed areas. Six of the ponds are NPDES surface <br /> monitoring sites and monitoring is undertaken in Sage and Dry Creeks as well as Hubberson Gulch. Surface <br /> and groundwater monitoring installations will remain until final phase III bond release. Water rights have <br /> been protected and a water augmentation plan was put in place for the over appropriated Yampa River. <br /> Alluvial Valley Floors <br /> A 1990 AFV study evaluated the Dry, Grassy and Sage Creek drainages around the Seneca IIW permit <br /> area with respect to their potential as AVF's. As intermittent streams, Dry and Sage Creeks have <br /> insufficient carrying capacity to remove sediment built up from fans emanating from tributaries and <br /> sediment from valley slopes. The lower reaches comprise alluvium with limited water availability <br /> although there exist areas of flood irrigation. AVFs do exist adjacent to and downstream of the Seneca <br /> Permit Number C1982057 Prepared by: R.Reilley NIS,GISP <br /> SL6 Phase II and III Page 5 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.