Laserfiche WebLink
before the term of the permit expires. In order to keep producing gravel out of this pit,the permit acreage <br /> would need to be expanded. To do this,Dolores County would have to submit a proposed action to the <br /> BLM showing their proposed expansion area. <br /> Upon receipt of the proposed action,BLM would work with the County to refine the proposal,which <br /> would then become the proposed action for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment(EA)to be <br /> prepared by BLM Staff. If the EA indicates that the proposed action,or alternatives can be completed <br /> without significant impacts to the environment, a decision could be signed by the BLM Field Manager to <br /> approve the mine plan and expand the free use permit area.Note that during our call with the BOCC, <br /> BLM had indicated that we would like the county to dig some additional test pits prior to evaluating the <br /> mine plan. Upon further discussion,we have decided that we could process the EA to include excavation <br /> of test pits(if needed) and mine expansion at the same time. <br /> Disappointment Pit <br /> The Disappointment Pit, located in San Miguel County, dates back to 1980 and it was developed in <br /> association with the now defunct Centennial Mine in the nearby Joe Davis Hill area. Ebberts <br /> Construction was the permitted operator under a series of commercial negotiated mineral materials <br /> contracts. The most recent permit expired in June of 2019,having had little if any production in the <br /> previous five years. When the contract expired, ownership of all stockpiled materials reverted to the <br /> BLM. When BLM issued the last Ebberts contract in 2014,BLM used a NEPA permitting tool called a <br /> "Categorical Exclusion"(CX)which requires less analysis than an Environmental Assessment so is <br /> normally less extensive. However,to qualify for a(CX) a mineral materials site cannot result in more <br /> than 5 acres of disturbance,BLM can quickly issue a free use permit to Dolores County to access existing <br /> stockpiles within the approved area identified in the 2014 CX. To approve the removal of additional <br /> materials even in the current boundary of the pit and expand the area of the pit, an EA would need to be <br /> prepared. The process for expanding the Disappointment Valley Pit would be very similar to the process <br /> outlined for an expansion of the Black Snag Pit. <br /> Currently, Ebberts Construction holds the mine permit from the Colorado Division of Reclamation, <br /> Mining and Safety(CDRMS). The county would need to contact the CDRMS and Ebberts construction <br /> to accept the reclamation liability for the site and have the CDRMS permit transferred over to the county. <br /> BLM and DRMS do not require reclamation bonds from local governments for free use permit pits, <br /> however the county can still be held liable for the cost of reclamation if the mine is left un-reclaimed. <br /> Once the CDRMS permit has been assigned to Dolores County, Ebberts construction could request the <br /> CDRMS release their bond. This letter serves as concurrence from the BLM for the CDRMS to transfer <br /> the permit and release Ebberts construction from reclamation liability once the permit and reclamation <br /> liability has been transferred to Dolores County. Transfer of the CDRMS permit would occur according <br /> to applicable State of Colorado rules and regulations and may require permits from San Miguel County as <br /> well. <br /> In the meantime,BLM would process a new free use permit to Dolores County for the existing stockpiled <br /> material. It is BLM's understanding that San Miguel County has requested that they be able to purchase <br /> gravel from Dolores County at cost of production, on an as-needed basis since the pit itself is located in <br /> San Miguel County. This is allowable because both Dolores and San Miguel Counties are local <br /> governments, however any purchase or exchange would need to be done strictly at cost,without a profit <br /> being accrued by either party, or any commercial sales. The exact arrangements of such an agreement <br /> would need to be worked out between the counties and would not be part of the permit. <br />