My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-16_REVISION - M2021013 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2021013
>
2021-03-16_REVISION - M2021013 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2025 5:21:13 AM
Creation date
3/17/2021 6:35:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021013
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/16/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ames Construction
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Trent Irick Page 4 <br /> March 3, 2021 <br /> a) A labeled permit boundary which must incorporate all the affected area (Note: the <br /> affected area includes all the area to be mined as well as haul and access roads that are <br /> newly created or improved for the mine operation); <br /> b) Label the names of owner(s) of record of the surface of the affected area and of the land <br /> within two hundred (200) feet of the affected area, identify the owner of the substance to <br /> be mined, and the type of structure and owners of record of any permanent or man-made <br /> structures within two hundred (200) feet of the affected area (including the box culvert <br /> which is off the map and other structures listed in Comment 6 above); <br /> c) Outline and label all major surface features to be used in connection with the proposed <br /> operation such as: existing and proposed roads, pit boundary, topsoil stockpiles, <br /> overburden stockpiles, product stockpiles, waste rock fills, stream channels, buildings, <br /> processing plant, underground openings such as adits or ventilation facilities, ponds, <br /> impoundments, dewatering pumps, diversions or waste disposal areas; <br /> d) Indicate the direction that construction material extraction will proceed; <br /> e) The permit boundary must also be shown on the reclamation plan map. <br /> Please provide maps that include all items a through e above. <br /> 6.3.6 EXHIBIT F—Other Permits and Licenses <br /> 16. Larimer County Permit. Does Larimer County require a permit? <br /> 6.3.11 EXHIBIT K—Terms of Governmental Contract <br /> 17. Government Contract. The executed government contract with the City of Fort Collins was <br /> provided via email on February 26, 2021. No response is required. <br /> 6.3.11 EXHIBIT L—Permanent Man-made Structures <br /> 18. Permanent Man-Made Structures. For any significant, valuable and permanent man-made <br /> structure within 200 feet of the affected area, Rule 6.3.12 requires the applicant to: <br /> a) provide a notarized agreement between the Applicant and the Person(s)having an interest <br /> in the structure, that the Applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to the <br /> structure; or <br /> b) where such an agreement cannot be reached (documentation demonstrating the attempt <br /> to obtain the agreement is required), the Applicant shall provide an appropriate <br /> engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by <br /> activities occurring at the mining operation; or <br /> c) where such structure is a utility, the applicant may supply a notarized letter, on utility <br /> letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining and reclamation activities, as <br /> proposed, will have "no negative effect" on their utility. <br /> The three structures listed on the provided agreement with Eugene Hofacker must be identified <br /> on the Exhibit E maps. Please provide the notarized agreements for the other structures <br /> discussed in Comment 6 above; or if agreements cannot be obtained, demonstrate an attempt <br /> was made (certified mail receipts are acceptable) and provide an appropriate engineering <br /> analysis demonstrating these structures will not be damaged by the proposed operation. This <br /> may be similar to the letter provided Horrocks Engineers for the "North Poudre Irrigation <br /> Company Box Culvert". However, in order to accept this type of letter analysis, it must be <br /> demonstrated that there was an attempt to obtain the damage compensation agreement. Please <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.