Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> (e.g., manufacture of cement). Methane is produced by livestock and other agricultural practices and by <br /> the decay of organic waste in municipal solid waste landfills. Methane is also emitted during the <br /> production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil. Nitrous oxide is emitted during agricultural and <br /> industrial activities, as well as during combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste. Please refer to the TRR <br /> (OSMRE and BLM 2019) Section 2.2.1 for further details. <br /> 3.4.1.2 Environmental Effects <br /> Under the Proposed Action,the King II Mine would continue to produce and transport coal at levels below <br /> the maximum allowable production limit of 1.3 million tpy (limit is per Colorado Department of Public <br /> Health and the Environment (CDPHE) Air Quality Permit No. 09LP0202F, Final Approval — Modification 1, <br /> Condition No. 2, dated 9/3/2013). Additionally, haul truck traffic is limited to about 1.1 million tpy in <br /> accordance with the LPC LUP (Project # 2012-0089) and RIA. It ultimately limits the truck trips to a <br /> maximum of 120 per day when all road improvements have been completed. <br /> For this air analysis,direct annual emissions calculations are based on each of the three annual production <br /> scenarios: producing an estimated 800,000 tons, 1.1 mt,and 1.3 mt. However,the total tonnage produced <br /> estimated throughout the life of the mine (22 years) is 17 mt. These emissions are associated with <br /> permitted and unpermitted sources, and both point and fugitive emissions. Another source of direct <br /> emissions is the construction of the low-cover crossing. A total of approximately 20 acres would be <br /> disturbed by the Project over the life of the mine.This would include 10 acres for construction of the low- <br /> cover crossing at the outset of the Project and 10 acres cumulatively for all other dispersed surface <br /> disturbances of variable sizes that would occur over the life of the mine. Other indirect emissions are <br /> associated with downstream coal combustion and commuter traffic. <br /> Effects of Alternative A—Proposed Action <br /> Direct Effects <br /> With the exception of airborne particulate matter,all the directly emitted criteria pollutants from the King <br /> II Mine's operations are from fuel combustion sources,such as mobile mining equipment and haul trucks, <br /> and from stationary sources such as emergency generators and heaters. Also, coal mine methane (CMM) <br /> is directly emitted by the ventilation air handling system required by the MSHA to reduce the <br /> combustion/explosion potential of the mine's underground atmosphere. Particulate emission sources <br /> include stockpiles, crushers, screening, conveyors, and loadout sites. Lastly, construction emissions <br /> associated with the construction of the proposed low-cover crossing and other dispersed surface <br /> disturbing activities over the life of the mine is also considered an indirect effect of the Proposed Action. <br /> Emission calculations are based on total volume removed (248,888 cubic yards), no off-site movement of <br /> material,watering and chemical suppressant(magnesium chloride:85 percent control)on unpaved roads, <br /> specific construction vehicle fleet and worker commuting travel. For a detailed discussion of emission <br /> calculations refer to the Environmental Effects in the TRR (OSMRE and BLM 2019) (Section 2.2.2). <br /> Table 3-2 provides a summary of projected direct emissions associated with the Proposed Action at the <br /> permitted 1.3 mt per year. Direct emissions from the Proposed Action would produce a minor impact on <br /> an annual basis because the overall change is not substantial but does have a measurable amount. <br /> Dunn Ranch Area Coal Lease by Application COC-78825 and Mine Plan Modification EA 3-8 <br />