Laserfiche WebLink
2. Structures within 200 feet of the affected land. <br /> All of the structures referenced the technical review belong to Chuck and Rebecka <br /> Osborn and include a few permanent and portable structures described as such: <br /> The Osborn residence is a 26'x 50'modular wooden frame structure with wood <br /> product exterior siding, south and west of the Osborn residence is a 12'x <br /> 12'wooden framed/metal sided storage shed, immediately south of the shed are <br /> six portable animal shelters, wooden framed/metal sided, a 10'x 12'wooden <br /> framed chicken coop, a 42'in diameter round pen defined by portable corral <br /> panels, and 75'x 100'arena area also defined by portable corral panels, and a 40'x <br /> 60'wooden framed/metal sided barn. All of the structures referenced above are <br /> included in an executed structures agreement. All fence lines bordering the mine <br /> property as well as interior fences that will be removed and replaced are covered <br /> under the lease agreement between Kagan and Osborn. <br /> 6.4.4 EXHIBIT D—Mining Plan <br /> 3. Exhibit D Working Areas. The mine plan narrative attempted(obviously not <br /> clear enough) to define the four phase areas for purposes of bonding while also <br /> describing the method used for gravel extraction that works smaller areas within <br /> the designated phase area, thus allowing bulldozer removal and replacement of <br /> overburden and planting media as compared to other equipment that might be <br /> used for soils removal, transport, and replacement at the conclusion of gravel <br /> extraction in that area. For purposes of bonding calculation, Phase 1 is 12.3 acres <br /> in area. Once bonding is in place and approved by the Division, mining will <br /> proceed as described in the mine plan narrative in smaller increments (3-4 acres <br /> of disturbance) until the 12.3 acre phase 1 area is mined of gravel resource. Prior <br /> to disturbance, phase 2 will have bond in place, as will be the case for phases 3 <br /> and 4. <br /> 6.4.5 EXHIBIT E—Reclamation Plan <br /> 4. Sediment Ponds. After review of Fremont County Engineer's comments (copy <br /> included) regarding the need for detention and the consideration of impact of <br /> storm run-off from reclaimed areas,the applicant has decided to remove the <br /> sediment pond at the conclusion of mining and reclamation activities. All <br /> reference to retention of the sediment ponds in the narrative sections of the <br /> mining and reclamation plan have been removed or corrected. Pages 1-8 of <br /> Exhibit E—Reclamation Plan edited are included in this mailing. <br /> 5. Rule 3.1.6(3)—Stabilized/Protected Affected Land. The applicant proposes to <br /> leave only the main haul road and a circular loop of roadway(22')as the final <br /> gravel covered area on site. The final gravel covered area is estimated to be <br /> approximately 3500'x 22'wide—2 acres. Thus, total reclaimed land area will be <br /> 87.5 — 11(no-mining area along Eight Mile Creek) = 76.5 —2= 74.5 acres. <br /> `PFs�o Q. -2— <br />