My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-09-08_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2020-09-08_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 4:11:03 AM
Creation date
9/8/2020 9:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/8/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ouray Silver Mines
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OLR-A SILI,,ER Alr E5 <br /> 25. DRMS Comment:Provide a quote for the amount of topsoil necessary to be imported(User <br /> Provided Cost). Speck if this cost includes delivery and its source location. <br /> OSMI Response: Weed free topsoil to be delivered to Ouray Silver Mines via Rocky Mountain <br /> Aggregate & Construction LLC in the amount of 4001 cy;with a total estimated cost of <br /> $176,000. <br /> 26. DRMS Comment: What is the average depth to be placed and the total number acres to <br /> receive cap rock at each TSF. Where is the stockpile location of the cap rock to be used for <br /> each TSF? <br /> OSMI Response: Berms will be constructed around the edge of each TSF using waste rock. The <br /> design of the TSF creates containment and eliminates the need for capping as the construction <br /> design creates the capping as the TSF is being constructed. <br /> Revegetation <br /> 27. DRMS Comment.Based on map F-1 only the TSF will be revegetated. Is this correct, <br /> previous revisions/calculations mention pond slopes, Northeast Rangeland area, and <br /> Southeast Rangeland area being reclaimed. <br /> OSMI Response: Yes,this is correct. <br /> 28. DRMS Comment:State the seeding method to be used(if method varies based on location <br /> give acers to receive various application types). It was previously assumed that drill seeding <br /> would occur but if terrain is too rough for power mulcher it's too rough for a drill seeder. <br /> OSMI Response: The type of seeding will be broadcast seeding. <br /> 29. DRMS Comment: TR-I1 bond calculation shows the use of a crimper and power mulcher <br /> for mulch application however the narrative states mulch will be applied by hand given the <br /> surface roughening(pocking). Clark the mulching application method to be used(if method <br /> varies based on location give acers to receive various application types). <br /> OSMI Response: The mulching application method will be hydro-mulching or spread by hand <br /> for smaller areas. <br /> 30. DRMS Comment:Provide the total job hours for revegetation (fertilize, seed and mulch). <br /> OSMI Response: The total job hours for the revegetation work has been provided in Exhibit L <br /> (Attachment 3). <br /> 151Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.